In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
To make any task successful, the person should be open minded. To achieve the pinnacle in any field or task, a person must have pragmatic view about the task in hand. hence the opposing view could offer a person different perspective, which he/she has not thought about. I support the statement presented, for any task, discussion with people of contrasting opinion would add a value for growth of task and would like to justify it using two situations.
First and formost, having discussion about any situation with people having same type of opinion does not always help to fully see through the problem in hand. For example, any democratic country has a ruling government and opposition. If opposition is removed from democracy, it will just reduce to autocracy. ruling government without any one to oppose their policies, will sanction bills which are beneficial for their party or supporters. this will impede the growth of nation. hence, presence of opposition having different opinion than ruling government in democracy is necessary for prosperity of the a nation.
Further than opposing views controlling check on unseemingly decisions, criticism by people with different opinions are healthy to the extent, till it is done to make the situation on the path of success. it is not necessary that contrasting opinion about any situation will always add to progress. Sometimes, this can lead to cause negative impact on the situation.
To sum up, having healthy dicussion with people having different opinion can add positive value to the progress of any task,. But excessive critism will also not add any positive outlook.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... pragmatic view about the task in hand. hence the opposing view could offer a person ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
... pragmatic view about the task in hand. hence the opposing view could offer a person ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ruling
...racy, it will just reduce to autocracy. ruling government without any one to oppose th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...to autocracy. ruling government without any one to oppose their policies, will sanction...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...neficial for their party or supporters. this will impede the growth of nation. hence...
^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... this will impede the growth of nation. hence, presence of opposition having differen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...emocracy is necessary for prosperity of the a nation. Further than opposing view...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions, criticism by people with different opinions are healthy to the extent, till...
^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... the situation on the path of success. it is not necessary that contrasting opini...
^^
Line 13, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...sitive value to the progress of any task,. But excessive critism will also not...
^^
Line 13, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...value to the progress of any task,. But excessive critism will also not add ...
^^
Line 13, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss of any task,. But excessive critism will also not add any positive outlo...
^^
Line 13, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any task,. But excessive critism will also not add any positive outlook.
^^
Line 13, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... But excessive critism will also not add any positive outlook.
^^
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... excessive critism will also not add any positive outlook.
^^
Line 13, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itism will also not add any positive outlook.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70417843155 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539622641509 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1381500376 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204109421556 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675041893609 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044033208458 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130325987406 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015241856571 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.