The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Great leaders are those who advocate and pro-actively support feedback system in the governance of decisions.
Successful leaders are well aware of the intricate complexities that surround their key decisions and key moves. Until when results are known and well understood, a decsion can be never be right and fruitful. Analysis and interpretation of any subject in any field, play a major role under anycircumstance. Such a scenario is only possible where there exists a predominant process of feedback. Consider any leader across the globe who are responsible from the posterity of ages for the development of the nation and its international relations. Across their close proximity, a sense of thorough discussion, retrospection and form of introspection does exist at any moment amongst the people they lead and hence form the most basic features of feedback process.
For instance, consider a great leader, say Narendra Modi, who is the most charming and an erudite leader of the India. Mr Modi is known for many susbstantive decisions that helped India in many different ways and thus augumented for various kinds of development. Such a leader is in constant touch with his sub-ordinates and update him with the recent developments and results. Until such releationship persists amongst the people who they lead, less are the chances for a leader to take decisions that might turn him into an autocrat. Such a healthy environments also curbs radical decions which can affect people and the surroundings in multitude of ways where reparations could be impossible.
However at times, the feedback system may turn into unncessary trivial discussions and pedantic time waste among the leader and the people. A leader will have many things to look out for. Nonetheless, paving a way for diminutive discussions and hearings from the people might result in detrimental effects at time when the focus is utmost necessary for the major decisions.
In anyway, looking at the pros of the feeback mechanism, it is helpful and must be encouraged by any leader among the people for the well being of the surroundings and for the efficient resutls of the decisiona that are made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...s international relations. Across their close proximity, a sense of thorough discussion, retros...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...stantive decisions that helped India in many different ways and thus augumented for various ki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'environment'?
Suggestion: environment
...rn him into an autocrat. Such a healthy environments also curbs radical decions which can af...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ere reparations could be impossible. However at times, the feedback system may turn ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: IN_ANYWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in any way'?
Suggestion: In any way
... necessary for the major decisions. In anyway, looking at the pros of the feeback mec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, hence, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18413597734 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94626007724 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549575070822 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7465418775 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258639310832 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796604329789 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639686208714 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146659407567 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406143529346 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.