The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones.
The writer of the statement glances the topic of best way of teaching, and asserts it by praising the positive actions and ignoring the negative ones. It can be true in some situations, but also can represent negative impact. I would disagree with the statement because of its quick divergance towards the negativity.
As mentioned by the writer, the best way of teaching is to praise positive actions, is certainly true. One needs to be praised for their hard work, as it will increase the confidence in the person, making him more involved in the topic. For example, an architect expects praise from his boss for his hard work on the designs of the project. If he won’t be praised, after a while, it will affect his performance as he’ll start feeling the lack of appreciation for his dedication and might end up leaving the job.
However, as much as praising and appreciation is important, focusing on one’s negative points is also important. Ignoring the negative actions will affect the overall performance in the community. For example, if an employee who’s been working hard for the last six months on a project, is only being praised by his boss and is not conveyed where he is lacking, or needs more improvement, it will be a waste of time for both. As the employee is dedicating his energy, time and health and the boss is giving his time for reviewing and verifying the scenario. If he will not be told about the negative actions he’s taking, there are less chances of success.
The best way to teach isn’t always praising the positive actions but is the one which balances both the praising positive and mentioning negative actions. At times, there is a possibility that it might affect someone’s feelings or might discourage them, but there will always be a guarantee of the best possible successful ending.
For instance, if a home tutor is focusing only on the positive results of the student, and isn’t discussing where he is lacking, the student won’t be able to improve. To score well in his class, the student needs to do well in all of his subjects and not just in some. If he won’t be indicated on his mistakes, he will repeat them with confidence, without the knowledge of where he is going wrong. This situation can be altered by the tutor, if he teaches the kid about his mistakes and not only praise him for his good marks.
Hence, as much as it is important to praise someone for their actions, it is also important to show them their negativity. It will be beneficial for the person himself. And that’s why I disagree with the writer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...iter of the statement glances the topic of best way of teaching, and asserts it by prai...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ive actions he's taking, there are less chances of success. The best way to t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79690949227 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72172450093 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452538631347 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.937346154 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.476190476 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260890696278 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104106356025 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161791549199 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169891770513 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124043264579 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.