The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones.
The statement discusses the best way of teaching and agrees on praising positive actions and ignoring the negative ones. In my opinion, I would disagree with the writer because of various reasons.
Firstly, teaching can be considered one of the toughest tasks as it requires great concentration and hard work from both the sides, and there are many chances of failing at times because of different reasons. The reasons might include bad teaching technique or carelessness while teaching, or lack of interest from the teacher or the student. But as the statement talks about the best way of teaching, favoring praising of positive actions and ignoring the negative ones can be considered a weakness of the teacher or can also be known as the blunder in the teaching world. And there are many quotidian examples in our lives to prove the statement wrong.
For instance, if a student has a home tutor and is the only person who teaches the student all the subjects and help with other school work and the tests. If the tutor will only praise the student for scoring well in some subjects and will ignore other subjects which require more concentration, it will affect the overall grading or the result of the student. Moreover, she won't ever will be able to identify or accept her mistakes as she's never been told about them and the end result might upset her.
There are many reasons why the statement lacks foresight and shows a concise point of view of the writer. If a person will only be praised for what he is good at, he will enjoy the treaties but this habit might spoil him in the future as he has never faced the negative points about himself. No one has ever pointed out the negative aspects in his work which might also affect his mental state by facing the negativities about his work in a sudden way.
Secondly, if a student won't be told about his negative actions, there are less chances of improvement in the activity. As the student is only being praised for the work he's been doing and there is no view point from his teacher about his weaknesses or on the topics he's failing, will decrease the chances of overall success. For example, if Steven Hawkins was praised by the media and his fellow mates for his first space theory and was not challenged by the other scientists, there is no way he would have searched further for a better space relativity theorem.
Concluding my point, there is no harm in praising a someone for their positive actions, in fact people do need and also deserve the praising for their work, but their negativities also should not be ignored. Confronting their negative aspects might hurt them for awhile, but it will also help them in improving their results which will be beneficial for their future. Hence, I disagree with the writer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about the best way of teaching, favoring praising of positive actions and ignorin...
^^
Line 9, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: she's
...e to identify or accept her mistakes as shes never been told about them and the end ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 437, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sudden way" with adverb for "sudden"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... facing the negativities about his work in a sudden way. Secondly, if a student wont be t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 75, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d about his negative actions, there are less chances of improvement in the activity....
^^^^
Line 17, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...dent is only being praised for the work hes been doing and there is no view point f...
^^^
Line 17, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...r about his weaknesses or on the topics hes failing, will decrease the chances of o...
^^^
Line 21, column 51, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: a; someone
... my point, there is no harm in praising a someone for their positive actions, in fact peo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 264, Rule ID: FOR_AWHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a while'?
Suggestion: a while
...ir negative aspects might hurt them for awhile, but it will also help them in improvin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73619631902 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40623789445 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449897750511 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9320575496 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257876377426 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982448428493 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183106360084 0.0758088955206 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177431282876 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165680822784 0.0667264976115 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.