The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
When it comes to choosing the best way to teach someone, people's views are ambivalent. Some contend that we should only focus on the good actions ignoring the bad ones, whilst other suggest precisely the opposite. As far as I am concerned, choosing only one side can never be the best way, for they have their own merits and demerits. It has to be a combination of the both to best educate someone.
To begin with, there is no way to deny the fact that encouragement is a very important aspect for education. By nature, we, the human, like to be praised for our actions and it gives us an incentive to work hard to attain more of it. For instance, when parents praise their children for practicing good habits like speaking the truth and completing task on time- kids get inspired to repeat those kind of action that have brought them accolades. The same thing goes for an employer. However, if the employer overlooks the positive actions of his employee- isn't it very probable for the employee to lose his spirit to deliver a good piece of work? It surely is.
On the other hand, if we continue to ignore the mistakes of someone who is still on his or her learning curve, the consequence will not be so good, either. He might not understand the effects of those mistakes and will be indifferent about it which may in turn, take a toll on others as well. For example, if a teacher ignores a student's offense who has adopted unfair means in the exam, the student will get provoked to do that again and again as it will earn him marks in a much easier way. It also has a far reaching negative influence on other students as well. Nevertheless, we should not solely avoid this trait by ensuring strict, excessive punishments as it can lead one to frustration. If the person who made that mistake, finds it difficult to take it normally and feels adament about not correcting it- that will obviously not serve the purpose.
In essence, I agree with this statement as long as it is not taken to the extreme. There are many shades of gray, however, in choosing the best option for teaching, it is by no means a foregone conclusion that only praising good deeds fused with ignoring bad ones is the best way. Essentially, a good combination of encouragement and punishment can ensure the most effective way of teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...sk on time- kids get inspired to repeat those kind of action that have brought them accola...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...s the positive actions of his employee- isnt it very probable for the employee to lo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ll. For example, if a teacher ignores a students offense who has adopted unfair means in...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57074340528 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55663610153 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551558752998 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5530993838 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.315789474 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158745132416 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468183286618 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311330562773 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960330363048 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298599975214 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.