Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
For any bussiness, education, government or politics experience is the most important thing that will mark the efficacy of the work the individual is doing. So, to step down as a leader and give control to a new person who is mot handy with the current working environment is not able to give you success what they envy. So, i am not in support with is claim.
Considering the fact that change is evitable and on one or the other day it will surely happen. But, to make it compulsary after every five years could result in a bad or worst move of the organisation. Five years is a time span in which an individual will get used to of the working and will take control of the proceedings according to his/her forsight. And to make change in the leadership can result in a negative for the organisation.
It takes all life of a person to establish a business and goodwill inthe market. Moreover the experience gained of how to tackle different problems and circumstances for the best of the company and employes working for them. For example, India's business tycoon Mukesh Ambani, formulated his market and it took around 15 years to build the trust of people on their service. And sudden change of the person having the reign of business in hands will surely undermine the trust people have gained. And will raise a question to work efficiency of the Muskesh Ambani.
Similarly, education is a vast field and it does not only include educating children from the books. But, to make an all round development. With change in people there comes a change in thinking and handling situations. For example, I our school, i was in class 10th, our principal encouraged us for participating in inter-school competition for various sports. And for that he planned to prepare a cricket ground for the student to practice. But, our principal got changed and a newly appointed principal was more inclined towards study and repeal the plan for cricket ground. Which was a huge heart break for all of us.
Moreover, many countries does follow the system of election every five years. But, i have seen many times that the person is getting reelected because people have developed faith and trust in their working. For example, Barak Obama was elected twice because of his working and trust developed amongst the nation. Indian prime minister Narendra Modi is elected twice because of his extraordinary working. We can put it on the deciding committee to whether make a change in leadership or not but making it compulsary is surely not an option.
In sum, i do agree change is inevitable but to make it necessary is no justification with the system and the people part of the system. We can put it on people to decide, do you want change or not, and that will be a better approach to things and betterment of the system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...to give you success what they envy. So, i am not in support with is claim. Con...
^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...h a business and goodwill inthe market. Moreover the experience gained of how to tackle ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... situations. For example, I our school, i was in class 10th, our principal encour...
^
Line 11, column 9, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ary is surely not an option. In sum, i do agree change is inevitable but to ma...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, similarly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7044534413 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64200674539 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48987854251 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5892764062 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3846153846 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.73076923077 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118860999159 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312522999903 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339452712897 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598281102513 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490204564343 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.