Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The sentence claims that in any field which one person or a small group could concentrate power in their hands, like business, politics, education and government, they might step down after five years in order guarantee a success path for any enterprise through the revitalization of the leaders. Henceforth, I strongly agree with the claim and the based reason.
In the first place, this strategy is largely used nowadays. We can take as an example, the political basis that word in most of the democratic countries. The maximum time allowed for a president or other type of politics is seldom no more than five years with, in some cases, no more than one re-election. There rule is used in order to avoid that only one person persists in the power and could generate a dangerous dictatorship which he/she transcend the paper of an administrative person to a self-interest person who is only trying to maintain they power. Under those circumstances, it is important to revitalize the leaders because, as the history showed to us, they tend to became corrupt or inefficient after a certain amount of time, in this case, about five years.
Moreover, the rotation of leaders could also solve intrinsic problems attached to the field or word. A new leader could approach the issues in a distinct way when compared with the old ones. Again, the political world is a very clever example. The change of right and left wings from time to time could be highly beneficial for the country, as the left-wing tends to word more with social and minorities issues, solving problems like poverty an unequal distribution of money and the right-wing work more with the companies and banks, bringing more money to the nation. In other words, the rotation of power is able to balance the people clamor and can solve a wide range of problems.
Furthermore, we can extrapolate what is visible in politics to any field that someone need to lead other people. An enterprise works in the same way of a national that is governed by a leader, even their names are the same: “president”. Thus, the actions and problems that we saw in the political word might appear in all fields and ought be treated with the same way and a very efficient solution is the revitalization of their leaders.
In conclusion, the claim show a very plausible way to achieve the reason presented. We can see everyday examples, more easily in the politics, that the leaders might be changed from time to time in order to create a surest path to success and that will surely work for any field of work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'transcends'.
Suggestion: transcends
...e a dangerous dictatorship which he/she transcend the paper of an administrative person t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a distinct way" with adverb for "distinct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... A new leader could approach the issues in a distinct way when compared with the old ones. Again,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and can solve a wide range of problems. Furthermore, we can extrapolate what is ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: OUGHT_SAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ought to be'?
Suggestion: ought to be
...cal word might appear in all fields and ought be treated with the same way and a very ef...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ed from time to time in order to create a surest path to success and that will su...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, in other words, in some cases, in the first place, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79006772009 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75810846949 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507900677201 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7356274997 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.823529412 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0588235294 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229931797876 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648025789872 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910115986736 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15138245805 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128765181511 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.