Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that nowadays society does not possess the hero or heroine as the past. The reason for this fact is the demolished fame by the scrutiny consideration of social media. While I agree with the claim, I fundamentally disagree with its supporting clue. In what follows I will list my potent proves to illustrate why I accept the claim but cast doubt on the validity of its supportive causes.
First of all, I prefer to define the hero at the initial step to clarify this misunderstanding. in the general term, a hero or heroine is a person with the supernatural capability who stands against the injustice or misfortune. People consider them as the hero or heroine for the sake of their weakness and unawareness. Nevertheless, nowadays, according to the development of technology and the enhancement of intelligence level is the society, rarely people considered themselves as incapable. For instance, in the past character such as the Robin Hood defended the poor people’s right and fought against the poverty of people; since they do not have this notice over their life standard and obey those all hunger and misfortune. However, in modern life, people are aware of their situation and are qualified to compare their conditions with others and pursue a better standard. In this case, everyone is his or her own Champaign.
Next, the complexity of majors in modern life leads to the term of expert highlighted instead of the hero. Actually, while the hero has the inherent ability, the expert has the knowledge and experience over the task. In the current situation, tasks are ambiguous and detailed, which require dexterous and information instead of instinct super ability. A lucid example of this belief is the existence of people such as the Bill Gates and Steve Jobs who get fame according to their intelligence and skilfulness. Or Dr. Samei the well-known neurosurgeon in Iran based on his dexterous over his patients. The question which should be answered now is: do we consider these people as the hero or the experts? Of course, they are experts who achieve to these stands according to their hard work, knowledge, and skill. These features are far from the inherent abilities of heroes.
Finally, the author uses the clue of the media scrutiny for abating the fame of heroes which causes the reduction of heroes’ number in the society. Although the social media punctilious over the well-known people, they reflect their activities. Consequently, a factor which diminishes the famous people fame is the scandal done by themselves. In this scenario, the repudiated person is accountable for this infamy. On the other hand, people also get familiar with the talented and proficient person via the introduction of social media. Indeed, they get popular with social media. Otherwise, they will be an unknown person.
To wrap it up, according to the above-mentioned reasons, the heroes are not scanty in the society because of blame the gained by the social media. The main reason for the decrement of the heroes in the society is the boosted level in the intelligence of ordinary people and the complexity of jobs which requires experts instead of heroes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proofs' (noun) instead of proves (verb)?
Suggestion: proofs
.... In what follows I will list my potent proves to illustrate why I accept the claim bu...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... step to clarify this misunderstanding. in the general term, a hero or heroine is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, of course, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2667.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05113636364 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83263378072 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498106060606 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 842.4 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5461667193 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166430545717 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468397535358 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419637474405 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107859999737 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415079274338 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.