Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
There are numerous journals in the world which publish the article of researchers. There is little surprise in Knowing that more than 10000 articles are published every day. In this situation, a group of scholars believes that researcher should limit their concentration to work on those areas which have prompt impacts and applications on the society. Proponents to this view believe that researchers should not concentrate merely on the applied sciences. I incline to the view that non-practical areas of research are as important as practical ones. However, it is possible for some research to predict the outcome of the published article.
First, science is divided into two major areas, Practical and pure ones. In pure science, students and professors work on the subjects which sometimes the researcher does not have a well-rounded understanding about the impact of the research on the everyday experience of people. Take Mathematics as an example. Someone spends one year to solve a matrix equation. He does not know the short-term effect of his endeavors but a statistics researcher used the study to develop a time-series model to predict the future of given data. Now, an economist who works on the effects of a policy introduced recently by government uses this model to critics the policy and shows that it would have an adverse effect on the economic and consequently, can lead the economy to the depression. Admittedly, when a policy-maker reads the Economics article he would try his best to introduce some reforms. Now suppose that the policy-maker read a line of Mathematics article, it is impossible for him to understand the effect of the article on the Economics and it is impossible not only for him but also for a majority of people to predict the outcome of the first article.
However, there should be one modification on which makes the claim and the reason more complete. It is possible for a group of publication to understand the outcome of the research. For example, in applied science and especially humanity and Arts science, the researchers mention their studies on the conclusion part. If a regular student who does not have any experience in this field study the conclusion or in some cases the abstract, she can grasp the effect of the article on the lives of the people in the whole or a part of the world.
In conclusion, I believe that limiting the area of the researchers’ studies to practical would have ramification on the practical areas since these two seemingly unrelated areas work like a chain that we cannot overlook it. However, we should consider that with an acceptable certainty we can predict the outcome of an article in some field of science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 957, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aker read a line of Mathematics article, it is impossible for him to understand t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99115044248 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91383692242 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469026548673 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4651576742 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291382554642 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853883137087 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612470357667 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185138277388 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473230170511 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.