Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is correctly contended in the claim that researchers should not limit their investigations strictly to area in which they are expecting to discover something that has immediate practical application. A holistic approach towards research is highly likely to produce extraordinary products and invention which will be essential for society. The reason provided states that outcome is impossible to predict, but with enough research already done in any field will surely give insight about what to expect; however, it does not clearly expound the main basis of the claim. Today's era has studies based on highly connected streams, a innovation in one field might be beneficial for the benefit of the other as well.
Currently, research areas have been highly intermixed, it has fused into one another. To clearly claim that a development in any field will affect only that field is fatuous. In the past, research topics were highly secluded and there were sporadic fields in which one could study, but contemporary research is mixture of various fields all together. For e.g., in earlier days, there used to be different specific departments of chemical, materials, biotechnology and nano technology, but recently these areas have fused together and breakthroughs in one field affects another.
The prime focus of social networking sites were to connect people through internet, but over the years it has found application in every aspect of society. People are not only connecting for socializing but also for doing business. Stand-up comedians for whom it was difficult to show their talent at large scale are finding this platform highly effective to penetrate across religion, caste, race, ethnicity and demography. Advertisement business has seen new height due to advent of social networking and people choice to use online platform for business. A tool which started for developing basic connection among students of a college, now holds biggest audience for any cause.
Several research whose main target was to benefit defense sector, when subjected in purview of larger audience proved highly effective for other usage as well. Advent of internet, wireless, GPS, and many more were strictly used by army personnel, slowly swept in to common masses in the form of telephone, mobile, wireless, location tracking. It is true that its very difficult to predict the out come of any research and keeping a multifarious approach toward research is always important.
Conclusively, one should not be myopic in looking beyond the scope of their designated field but several inspirations and parallels can be drawn from the collective approach in finding solution of humanities' main concerns. Medical field and Engineering were supposed to be to different sect, but today these societies work hand in hand in order to achieve great inventions.
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application. Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. 61
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to 70
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 16
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...dies based on highly connected streams, a innovation in one field might be benefi...
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...tform for business. A tool which started for developing basic connection among st...
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'holds the biggest'.
Suggestion: holds the biggest
...ection among students of a college, now holds biggest audience for any cause. Several rese...
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some research'.
Suggestion: Some research
...olds biggest audience for any cause. Several research whose main target was to benefit defens...
Line 7, column 394, Rule ID: OUT_COME
Message: Did you mean 'outcome'?
... that its very difficult to predict the out come of any research and keeping a multifari...
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'hand in'.
Suggestion: hand in
...nt sect, but today these societies work hand in hand in order to achieve great inventions.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'e.g.', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254032258065 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.161290322581 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104838709677 0.0880659088768 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0665322580645 0.0497285424764 134% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0221774193548 0.0444667217837 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118951612903 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0524193548387 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77531357365 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0362903225806 0.030933414821 117% => OK
Particles: 0.00201612903226 0.0016655270985 121% => OK
Determiners: 0.0604838709677 0.0997080785238 61% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0161290322581 0.0249443105267 65% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181451612903 0.0148568991511 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2852.0 2732.02544248 104% => OK
No of words: 450.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33777777778 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.415555555556 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315555555556 0.280924506359 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242222222222 0.200843997647 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151111111111 0.132149295362 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77531357365 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 219.290929204 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 70.1030386763 55.4138127331 127% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.380412469 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6588260368 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.444444444 141.124799967 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.380412469 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 56.5555555556 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.70161290323 1.64882698954 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489854296136 0.391690518653 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.080004379307 0.123202303941 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0355012373566 0.077325440228 46% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526947530375 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.1099049994 0.149214159877 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172524686975 0.161403998019 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116825706675 0.0892212321368 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.266784378481 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0658427315828 0.0692045440612 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297155794699 0.275328986314 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121926569188 0.0653680567796 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.70907079646 332% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.