Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The work undertaken by a person of any field ranging from complex theoretical like science, engineering to mirth and jovial as in arts is judged by many perspectives of people varying in knowledge of the field. This arises a question which judgement gives the best valuation of the work? The stated point that critical judgement has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field is acceptable.
Experts of any field has spent years in studying and understanding all the aspects relating to the field, giving them unfathomable enlightenment about the field. The prolonged practice of work give them experience about their strengths,weakness and mistakes and overcoming such conundrums thus making them paragons. The judgements they give are thus backed up with rigorous analysis and logic turning out to be accurate evaluation of work at hand.
Critics are required in all the fields of profession for judgements. The movie industry is repleted with critics, everyone presenting own reviews regarding the movie. The audiences having differing taste of genres thus might have differing and contrary review about the movie. One cannot judge the movie based on those reviews and thus real value of movie is judged by the reviews of critics who are expert in analyzing the movie from all aspects. Museums hire experts for getting information about the unearthed fossils or sculptures recovered from ramshackle archaic buildings. A non-expert has superficial knowledge might completely misjudge a paragon of extinct art to be a filthy thing covered in mud.
The asperity of judgement from experts should not be misunderstood as their insolence, rather tyros in the field take it as learning lessons. Such critical reviews help beginners to better shape their vision, knowledge and ability to produce a prodigious unprecedented work in the field. Thus opinions from experts helps improving the future generation of the field ensuring the prosperity and advancement of the field.
In contrast, the judgements given by non-experts should not be obviated, They might have significance. Every expert in the start was once a beginner, they made mistake learnt from it and then reached to apex of the field. If beginners are blatantly ignored, this will demotivate them hampering the growth of an individual. For example a movie suggested by dilettante audience, poorly rated by critics turns out to be huge commercial success.
In conclusion, judgements given by experts are next to the accurate giving exact idea of work's impact and value but non-experts' judgements should also be considered in account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , weakness
...ve them experience about their strengths,weakness and mistakes and overcoming such conund...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zing the movie from all aspects. Museums hire experts for getting information abo...
^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...igious unprecedented work in the field. Thus opinions from experts helps improving t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to improve' or 'improve'.
Suggestion: to improve; improve
...field. Thus opinions from experts helps improving the future generation of the field ensu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urns out to be huge commercial success. In conclusion, judgements given by exper...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2217.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3038277512 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88686600482 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540669856459 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3460642355 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.85 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417860320147 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122297995464 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130007992964 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220722974979 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122599982378 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.