Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Giving valuable judgement is always encouraged in our society. No matter what scale of judgement is given. It will always have a positive effect toward others. I am positive that people are able to give valuable judgement to other fields even if they are not experts in those fields.

Judgments from non-experts and other fields can give different aspects and ideas to the experts in a certain field we are criticizing. People tend to think that we should not criticize other fields we are not experts in, since we will be considered reckless and ignorant. However, experts who provide services and entertainments need feedback from the public who are not experts. For example, chefs who have decades of experiment in cooking and pastry regard judgments of their customers as highly valuable. Sometimes they even encourage diners to give harsh and strict feedback because they think non-experts might have an different view of the dish that chefs have overlooked. Thus, their skills are able to move to a higher level and become a better chef.

Moreover, we also give judgments on music and art and artists tend to like their worked being judged because others opinions might be the next music idea or art topic. We do not have to excel in music editing or painting to be able to feel the meaning of the piece of art. Individuals have different feelings towards an art piece and when public feedback is collected by artists, they might produce something more marvelous. Nowadays, where artists upload their work online, feedback from the public will appear at the comment section. Artists can response to people's judgments and even have discussions with them. Thus making their work more popular and successful.

However, some may argue that fields which require a large amount of backgrounds knowledge like physics, mathematics and engineering cannot be easily judged. Without a proper training and experience, judgment toward there fields are useless unless you are an expert. Although this might be true for some very sophisticated areas. However, there is only a few experts in a certain field. Judgments from their peers may sometimes be

narrow. For example, when professors faced a difficult issue in the laboratory, the same fields of experts might have the same way of solving problems and thinking. Therefore, its hard for to have out of the box thinking. By accepting judgments by the judgments by their students or other professors at other departments. Their problems might be solved faster.

While judgments from the same field of experts might have a narrow aspect, judgments from other fields or non-experts might have a more valuable feedback.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...cause they think non-experts might have an different view of the dish that chefs h...
^^
Line 13, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gments from their peers may sometimes be narrow. For example, when professors fa...
^^^^
Line 15, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Narrow
...s from their peers may sometimes be narrow. For example, when professors faced a d...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12557077626 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60146167452 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495433789954 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3272681984 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3461538462 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201596018189 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597632568807 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611591947685 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115195919308 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585220411487 0.0667264976115 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.