Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The given claim describes that the educational institutions should take full responsibility to not to pursue fields in which they will not got success. Educational institutions are playing important role in improving education standards by providing new teaching methods and implementing practical knowledge. But, for this argument I am completely against the because it is very difficult for educational institute to found out the correct field for a particular student.
First of all, if an educational institutes provide fields to particular student by testing it on various criteria than it may possible that he will loss his interests in the field which was provided by institute. It may increase number of failures which also leads to increase the number of suicides. For an example, the great scientist Thomas Edison at the very young age declared not fit for primary education. Afterwards his mother provided lessons to him at home and then at young age he got is interested in the science and he invented an Electric Bulb. By above example it is clarified that interest in that field is necessary.
Let’s take another example of the famous cricketer, Rahul Dravid who has taken commerce as major field in his higher secondary school. After higher secondary, he started his preparation for Chartered Accountant Exam in which he failed with very poor grades. But he was very passionate about Cricket therefore he starts focusing on Cricket and now entire world knows for his batting skills. He is the master of sport due to his passion towards the cricket.
On the other hand, educational institutions may help the students to find their area of interests towards field whether it is science & technology, music, arts, social studies, commerce or sports. The institute should appoint qualified career counselors which provide better knowledge regarding student’s interested fields. It will open the path for success, glory and provide stability in student life. The faculties should continuously be in contact with students and asks for their weaknesses.
At last, so educational institutions should find the area of interests on basis on different techniques. On the basis of those results, the student must be helped in his activities related to his field rather to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...to pursue fields in which they will not got success. Educational institutions are p...
^^^
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'institute'?
Suggestion: institute
...udent. First of all, if an educational institutes provide fields to particular student by...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27176781003 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86614588669 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564643799472 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0637376453 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234383516764 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776007175132 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085810922589 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150830179335 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804533574248 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.