Educational Institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
While some people tend to think that educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade the students from certain field of study which they are unlikely to be successful, others seem to disagree with it. In my opinion, I believe that educational institutions certainly do have this responsibility.
To begin with, educational institutions have a responsibility to make the students to decide the best decision to prevent the failure of students. To be specific, educational institutions have to analyze what kind of the courses or majors are conducive to the students. For example, my major is economics when I was in college. Choosing economics is the advice from my high school teacher, since he is the man who understand me a lot than other people. It is convinced that his advice is the best for me. I truly had lots of interest with the economics, and I got a good grade during my lots of exam.
Moreover, educational institutions can make the students feel more comfortable when they study in the right field. That is to say, if advisors make the right decision to students, students may not be impeded by too many difficult things, since the field is adaptive to them. for instance, my friend, Alex, who wanted to study computer science in graduate school. His advisor incited him to study that field. After he studied, he had lots of arduous problems, and he could not figure out how to resolve, even though lots of his friends try to teach him. He eventually got lots of terrible scores, and he did not learn too much about computer science. Therefore, I think it is very important for educational institutions to dissuade students from the field that they might not adaptive.
True, some people might say that educational institutions should not dissuade the students because they played the teacher who should cheer up the students. However, this belief fools to consider the fact that if all the educational institutions incite every student, students would not have a opportunity to know what the disadvantage they have. Lots of students will fail since they thought that they adapt every courses our subjects. Thus, it is hard to convince people of this idea.
To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I think that educational institutions do have to let the students know the fact that they need to give up some courses which they are not adaptive. There seems to be some validity to other points of view. However, I still believe that the reasons of my opinion are stronger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun exam seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of exams'.
Suggestion: lots of exams
...omics, and I got a good grade during my lots of exam. Moreover, educational institution...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...s, since the field is adaptive to them. for instance, my friend, Alex, who wanted t...
^^^
Line 13, column 293, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... every student, students would not have a opportunity to know what the disadvanta...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92957746479 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79896578797 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476525821596 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4126759236 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.40909090909 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412534389436 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118837299581 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130747764695 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254173618129 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116022043777 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.