Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Perhaps one of the most thought provoking arguments in the 21st century has been that of educational institutions. In the mark of an era characterized by "disruption" and thinking outside of the paradigm, education has been the one constant throughout. A traditional field focused on teaching students to work towards the jobs that are hiring, it is time that we make a change to this broken industry. The future of jobs is unknown, so it is important that we teach students freethinking and encourage them to follow their passions so they are able to master their respective subjects.
A job is temporary, but a career is built around your passions. There aren't many people who grow up hoping to get an adequate salary package and decent benefits. We are aspirational by heart. We are motivated by success! More often than not, it is those who master their subject that can achieve such goals. In order to become a titan in one's industry, it requires an amalgm of hard work and repetition. This is not for the weak of heart. By learning subjects that we show genuine interest in, it becomes considerably easier to not only learn but to grow. Take Aubrey McClendon, the late CEO and founder of Chesapeake Energy. He had no background in oil and gas, but he decided to take a minimum wage job on an oil field in order to learn. Two years later, he founded what would become one of the largest oil drilling companies in the world. If student's are so bent on finding a safe job, McClendon could have become an accountant. Life is about passion. It is imperative to teach our students to pursure what they are interested in.
It is important to consider the ever changing nature of the job market. Thirty years ago, computer science was a foreign topic. A computer would cost the government millions of dollars to build. Nobody could have predicted that the same amount of computing power would be downsized into our phones in less than half a century. Perhaps even more incredulous is that the cost is pennys on the dollar of what it used to be. Computer science was not a desirable industry. Today? Computer science jobs are four times higher in demand than in supply. The students that were pressured into taking the jobs that were hiring then, are now at risk of missing jobs that are ample today. The world is dynamic; industries are changing daily. If we pressure our young academics to pursue traditional employment routes, we risk losing innovation and free-thinking.
Conversely, it is important to understand that some people are inclined to gravitate towards jobs that are stable and plentiful. An abundance of people will be happy leading a life in a consistent job. Predictable hours, pay and benefits all represent a luxury not afforded by following one's dreams. Nonetheless, it is important to teach students the values of both sides of the equation. Present unbiased facts and let the students decide. The best thing that our educational constituents can do is to stay neutral and teach our academics how to think on their own.
A plethora of people have made great livings by following their passions. After all, the future job industry is just as fluid and unpredictable as we are. Irregardless, some people are inclined to follow the stability of jobs in demand now. It's vital that education does not influence the decision of our youth, but rather teachs them how to make decisions on their own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...er is built around your passions. There arent many people who grow up hoping to get a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ch goals. In order to become a titan in ones industry, it requires an amalgm of hard...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, nonetheless, so, then, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2844.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 590.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82033898305 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92848004997 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77664987794 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516949152542 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7474911899 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.8648648649 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9459459459 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.43243243243 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101380063933 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229219912431 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242296069625 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632091362806 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228470066978 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.