“Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national security.”
Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true.
Countries all over the world are experiencing some or other sort of problems which they address through various methods. But, when there is a case of national emergency it calls for an extra precautionary steps to preclude any mishaps. The author contends that governments are allowed to breach civil laws when there is a case of national exigency. I generally agree to author's contention. However, to substantiate my point of view this essay will elaborate my reasons.
Firstly and foremost, if the government declares a country-wide alert then there must be some gargantuan issue. If the government thinks that there might be an internal conflict then to prevent such bicker which might worsen the situation can parry civil laws and take necessary actions. For example - like in India, when Hon. Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi was shot dead by 2 men belonging to particular caste, national emergency was declared and to prevent mob lynching or wide spread hatred of people against that caste people, government had withdrawn the autonomy to publish certain instigating articles.
Secondly, if there is a possibility that some endemic group of the country is involved with some foreign criminals who might with the help of this group exacerbate the situation, government can dodge civil laws and could invade their(group) privacy by tracking its every move. To clarify this point let us assume that there are few men have deep roots with mafias, now in a nation-wide exigency government can disable the internet and all communication tools in that areas like Whatsapp. This way they precluded the possible attack where a scoundrel through internal puppets could try to exacerbate the situation. Hence, if government believes that snatching away some rights like right to speak and form coalitions and right to privacy, they can stop the attack or prevent situation from getting worse, then they are absolutely allowed to do so.
Thirdly, we are forgetting that the rights or civil laws which the government is avoiding is just temporary. Like some rights such as right to privacy, is emphemeral and also applied to only few attack prone parts of the country.
Also, there might be a case where government might misuse its power, but this type of luxury to the government shall only be allowed to democratic governments and dictators should be deprived of such powers.
Concluding my aforementioned points, democratic government shall be allowed to enjoy such powers as it would be a decision not one man, but an entire fleet of intellectual people who with thorough scrutinization would use the power if necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'step'?
Suggestion: step
...ncy it calls for an extra precautionary steps to preclude any mishaps. The author con...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'author'.
Suggestion: author
...national exigency. I generally agree to authors contention. However, to substantiate my...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is just temporary. Like some rights such as right to privacy, is emphemeral and a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75929109472 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551643192488 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.254029518 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.470588235 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0588235294 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136506089012 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482414490072 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432867035677 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723745023256 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297993839768 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.