Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The assertion that governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future is a controversial one. On one hand, it is very important to solve current issues hampering the country instead of focusing on the future problems. On the other hand, if government pays attention to anticipated problems, than it would be very much helpful in developing the nation as more problems can be avoided in future if they are sorted out on very first hand. However in the final analysis, it is much more beneficial if government put forwards its resources in solving the vulnerable present and on-going issues rather than putting in much more effort for anticipated ones.
Firstly, it is well known that today is the best time to begin any work. Government should undoubtedly focus on current issues and use their resources to curb them. For example, issues like poverty, education, malnutrition, etcetera should be addressed first instead of putting more focus on long term planning. If current issues of malnutrition are not looked upon with more importance than in coming days, it will convert into a bigger health issue in near future. If proper focus is not put on educational reforms then it will prove to be serious blow to literacy rate.
Moreover, government should currently focus on funding the employment sector more and more rather than increasing funding for scientific research for making innovations that would be helpful in future to avoid the rise of unemployment on larger scale. Similarly, government should prioritise its focus any unfortunate calamity prone area more than developing any non-affected region. Also, issues like fuel crises, economic and social reforms await immediate action and planning. These issues on not being looked upon properly in current time would hamper any nation’s progress in upcoming years.
However, focusing on future problems is also of very much importance in this modern world. Focusing on anticipated issues and problems created due to global warming or any natural calamities is equally important. Being oblivious of such problems would lead to more and more chaos in the country. For example, it is far more tactical to take constructive actions for issues like flood or earthquake rather than waiting for it and then spending more money and manpower to overcome it when it actually occurs. For example, defence planning should be done by anticipating future issues that could strike the nation. One cannot wait for any rival country to attack with lethal weapon. Instead, scientific research should be triggered to overcome such issues.
To sum up, it is necessary that a country focuses on anticipated problems of future but it is very much important to look into present problems first because if present problems are overlooked, then they would harbinger bigger future chaos and problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...they are sorted out on very first hand. However in the final analysis, it is much more ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 661, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...s in solving the vulnerable present and on-going issues rather than putting in much more...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o a bigger health issue in near future. If proper focus is not put on educational ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22245762712 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70287755494 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466101694915 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3486277326 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.380952381 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350181881042 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115682465346 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157110615824 0.0758088955206 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207533865191 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119828344347 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.