If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A goal can an object or it can be an ambition of a person. People use different means to achieve their goal and make successful life. The goals may be chosen for personal growth or it can be for social cause, but it does not mean an individual take any path to achieve the goal. The process to achieve the goal should be moralistic and appropriate then it will be justifiable. Thus, I strongly believe that, "how achieved" is more important than "what achieved". There are examples which supports my stance and explain how the worthy goals should achieved through appropriate means.
Moreover, the way we work to get goal or success helps to analyses the learning throughout the journey. For example, a student wants to gain highest marks in the final exam, and he can use any way to achieve his goal. Finally, he got his goal with cheating and coping from others answer sheet. He got success does not mean that he gets knowledge because exams have taken to analyses the level of knowledge. He got the marks but the knowledge lacks which will become obstacle in further goals of life. The correct path has difficulties and lots of lessons which teach about life and the shortcut to achieve the goal is not justifiable in future results itself.
Furthermore, in sports plays has worthy goal for their success but the path should be legitimate. So many examples we read in sports news about drugs and medication used to win the game. Similarly, there is a famous Olympic player from India named Milkha Singh has faced hard time in sports because some players harass him and want to frighten away from competition. But he is ambitious and work hard to make the success which clearly show that the means taken to attain the success increases the sweetness of the final achievement. The other player who tried to distract him also got named in few games, but they are not as much renowned as Milkha Singh was. So, it is important to choose moralistic path to obtain the goal.
However, when goal is decided for welfare of society than it can be well founded to meet from any means. To give benefits to one society one cannot harm other societies. For example, to seize land for people of one nation they attack on other country and fight. According to attacker they are doing good for their society, but it is not justifiable. In India River's Sangam project is going on, under it different large rivers will combine with small distributes to supply enough water. But under this project so many villages face drought and so many-faced flood. The project is very good but although it disturbs large population then it cannot reasonable or justifiable.
To sum up, one should have worthy goal as well as has moralistic way to do it. On the basis of above discussion, we can say that with the goal one should have an appropriate path to achieve it otherwise its success will diminished in few days itself.
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products.Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening 55
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 23
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 23
- government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'analyse'.
...we work to get goal or success helps to analyses the learning throughout the journey. Fo...
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'gain the highest'.
Suggestion: gain the highest
...ourney. For example, a student wants to gain highest marks in the final exam, and he can use...
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'analyse'.
...s knowledge because exams have taken to analyses the level of knowledge. He got the mark...
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
...o achieve it otherwise its success will diminished in few days itself.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, then, thus, well, for example, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.720703125 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51232238445 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48046875 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9279047858 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5185185185 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.962962963 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.74074074074 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154721321152 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461116129582 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364307478339 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833087222784 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030301063832 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.