A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
While considering the recommendation that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college might appear to be good idea from a distance, one must consider underlying facts before they can make this claim.
First, if a nation has a set curriculum until college, it fails to cater to all of the students in an entire nation. One must research and investigate national data to determine the number of students who plan to attend college and the number of students who do not plan on attending college. If a nation has a set curriculum, they will fail to prepare a large portion of its students for opprotunties other than college; such as students entering the workforce or the armed forces. For example, if high school student in Texas, has been raised a farmer and is very knowledgable about his family's farm, a set curriculum would not cater to this individual, because college is not in his best interest. If this student studied the set curriculum that prepared him for college, it would fail to make him ready to start his carreer in farming.
Second, this reccomendation fails to take geographic differences into consideration. To make this claim, one must research geographic differences to determine if a set curriculum is possible for standarized testing and appropriate knowledge of students. For example, a first grade student in Alaska should not be required to know specific attributes about an armedillo on a standarized test. However, attributes and characteristcs of this animal would likely to appear on a standarized test for a first grade student in Texas.
Finally, by a nation having a set curriculum, it would not allow teachers to teach to their full potential. By having a set curriculum, it would force teachers to teach specifically to a national standarized test and curriculum. By doing this, it would not allow teachers to fill the specific needs of the students in their classroom. A set curriculum, would put teachers on rigorous schedules, which would not allow a liberal and exciting learning environment.
For the author to make the claim that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, they must complete more research to have supporting data for the reasons stated above. While the arguement might appear to be benefitial, there are underlying factors that the author must investigate before this claim can be made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...lum until college, it fails to cater to all of the students in an entire nation. One must ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and characteristcs of this animal would likely to appear on a standarized test f...
^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eral and exciting learning environment. For the author to make the claim that a ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te more research to have supporting data for the reasons stated above. While the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04622871046 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90103517987 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435523114355 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5102679208 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286766339072 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112054425252 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107126884002 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186433549583 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863611770559 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.