.A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Recently, a prevalent idea that government should focus all students on the same curriculum before they entering university. Because some subjects are so significant that students would have a hard time in college without learning them. Opponents, however, argue that students should choose the curriculum on their own. As far as I am concerned, two both are reasonable. Here are my opinions.
To begin with, subjects like math, English, chemistry and so on are essential for all students. Specifically, these subjects could provide a strong base before university studying. At the same time, these curriculum also could provide us abundance knowledge about our daily life. For instance, physical knowledge tells us why light comes fast than sound when lightning, chemistry teaches why burning incompletely brings smoke. In the contrary, assuming how terrible our life would be without learning the basic principle of the objects surrounding us. As a result, it is important to require all students learning these subjects.
Despite some curriculums are necessary for all students, the subjects like art, music, history should be provided depend on students' interests. Depending on a study from the University of Tokyo, the ratio of students prefer to study painting, singing, dancing, playing baseball is different greatly. This is because different people have various talent. At the same time, environment also could influence their likes. There is no doubt that students could work better on the curriculum which they prefer to. Hence, giving the right of choosing curriculums is also crucial.
All in all, a reasonable approach is focusing all students on some important subjects. At the same time, follow the students' own willingness to achieve their unique skills. In this case, government could make sure that the students achieve not only rudimentary skills but also making a good use of their own talent. There is universally acknowledged that the student is the future of society. Keeping the variety of students also promises a colorful future.
This is my answer that-that let those who have been told for so long by so many to be cynical, and doubtful, and fearful about whether students need to learn the same curriculum to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more for a better day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iculum before they entering university. Because some subjects are so significant that s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this curriculum' or 'these curricula', 'these curriculums'?
Suggestion: this curriculum; these curricula; these curriculums
... university studying. At the same time, these curriculum also could provide us abundance knowled...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for instance, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2486631016 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70781699349 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6187998013 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.347826087 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2608695652 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69565217391 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187748854221 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552982480122 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510171822902 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109092461488 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339595146346 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.