Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Our planet earth contains millions of species and each specie plays a very vital role to keep this planet habitable. It is true that humans are the smartest species on the earth and have every right for better living but any facility is far less important than survival on the earth. It is a result of our negligence that we are searching for life on other planets. Therefore, the government should do everything in its capacity to save what we have left.
It is not actually a choice, but a necessity to maintain the ecological balance of our planet earth. Our planet is designed in such a way that every living being plays a very crucial role in maintaining this balance. For instance, Carnivorous animals eat Herbivorous animals and Herbivorous animals, in turn, eat plants. It keeps the populations just in balance. But Human being smartest specie on the earth has developed a lot of ways to make its life easier and due to medical advancements, life expectancy has widely increased due to which this natural balance has been disturbed. An increase in the Human population has demanded more land resulting in a decline in the forest area which in turn affects the wildlife living in the forest. Hence, it is really important to preserve what we have left and the government should do everything in their hands to make that happen.
Trees are responsible for producing oxygen which is essential for living for every specie on the planet. We breathe oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. But tree during photosynthesis inhales CO2 and exhales O2. They produce O2, food for us to live, if we keep cutting the jungles, this balance between O2 and CO2 will be disturbed and earth will become inhabitable for us.
Someone can argue that if a particular forest has an economic benefit, it should be used for the development of the nation. And the same amount of forest can be developed on another land to maintain the balance. This way, cutting this particular forest and using the resources that exist beneath them can be a good way to achieve both goals. But the argument fails to take into consideration for the time it will take to rebuild that level of the forest and hence it is flawed. It is actually, just an excuse to nullify the argument above.
In conclusion, the wilderness that currently exists on the planet is very important for the survival of human beings than any other economical benefit. Hence, everything should be done to implement this policy full-bore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the smartest'.
Suggestion: being the smartest
... populations just in balance. But Human being smartest specie on the earth has developed a lot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, really, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81733021077 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61790665869 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480093676815 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4447497517 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179152595987 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522390206414 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527715073799 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108425453068 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332362467782 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.