Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Arts, in its general meaning is one of the major branches of a culture of a nation, the collection of beliefs, products and attitudes that link the people of a country to their history and origin. Culture also is a means that a country can use to introduce its honor and success to other nations and cultures. In this regard, refusing to fund cultural activities which certainly art is one of its major parts would harm the whole society. What would be a country without anything to be proud of? Many artistic work remain after centuries and in fact they are the most important factor that can represent a nation through history.
Furthermore artistic activities like painting, making films and performing theatre can also motivate people to help each other and reduce the problems of poor people. For example a painting that depicts the miserable condition of a family can stimulate other individuals to help poor families in terms of financial aides or finding jobs for them. As another example there are many concerts or shows which their financial profit are expend in ameliorating the conditions of poor people. Some years ago an earthquake happened in my country that killed hundreds of people. For helping the survived people and returning their hope back numerous festivals and concerts were held on those region which really had useful effects.
It is true that, in poor countries the indigent people also matter. Government should not appropriate abundant amount of money to every activities which claim it is an aspect of art. Governments should prioritize and give financial aids only to those activities that have more profound results and also the ones which are in danger of extinction. Besides many artistic activities have the ability to earn money themselves. They do not need the help of governments at all, even they can be used to gather money for poor and jobless people.
Another way which governments can apply to support both poor people and art, is to encourage these people to make artistic products and then help them to sell their products. In this way governments without expending any money realize both purposes.
In conclusion, as art is one major part of the culture of a country, nations should not stop funding artistic activities, however considering the condition of poor and jobless people these artistic activities can be directed in a way which benefit poor people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...an represent a nation through history. Furthermore artistic activities like painting, maki...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'expended'.
Suggestion: expended
... shows which their financial profit are expend in ameliorating the conditions of poor ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 677, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this region' or 'those regions'?
Suggestion: this region; those regions
...ous festivals and concerts were held on those region which really had useful effects. It is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, really, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00248756219 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59774036302 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509950248756 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1243038529 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.722222222 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146114593461 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480415583318 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369562023835 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907909170333 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158737545559 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.