People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
In my opinion people who take decisions based on emotions are indeed poor decision makers. Decisions should be based on sheer logic and cold rationals. Human elements such as emotions often veil the objective assessment of a situation. This can be better exemplified with the example of a doctor. A doctor is expected to operate on a patient who may or may not be associated with him. His decisions should be solely a function of his reason and medical logic. If he/she deviates from this medical practice it may lead to unwarranted medical conditions. The health of the individual cannot be wasted due to his emotional upheaval. Similarly one can think of a soldier who is commanding an army. He cannot live with the delusion that his decisions can be based on his/her fancy. The point here is, positions of commands demands leaders who can keep their personal emotions aside and take decisions that are appropriate and logical.
The emotional reaction of a person can stem from various factors such as prejudice against a person, love or feeling of superiority. Thus it is very difficult to justify such decision. To further elaborate on my point if a decision is solely based on emotions stored inside the recesses of a human mind, he/she is bound to put his/her self-interest over the group. His thinking is narrowed due to his personal inclinations or disinclination.To rationalize such thoughts is nothing but a failed attempt on the part of the individual to convince his own self what he did was right and not out of personal vendetta.
But again one must realize that to err is human. Human beings are bound to get their decisions flawed and attach to emotions. But it may be at a very high cost. A death penalty conferred to a criminal by a judge based on emotional grounds though can be justified later but we risk the loss of a human life.
It is imperative to understand that decisions should only be based on facts and emotions must ever creep into logical conclusions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nction of his reason and medical logic. If he/she deviates from this medical pract...
^^
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...e wasted due to his emotional upheaval. Similarly one can think of a soldier who is comma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...person, love or feeling of superiority. Thus it is very difficult to justify such de...
^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...personal inclinations or disinclination.To rationalize such thoughts is nothing bu...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222222222222 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.176151761518 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0975609756098 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0514905149051 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0514905149051 0.0444667217837 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113821138211 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0460704607046 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77183395611 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352303523035 0.030933414821 114% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0840108401084 0.0997080785238 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0460704607046 0.0249443105267 185% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0162601626016 0.0148568991511 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1990.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 344.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78488372093 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351744186047 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270348837209 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191860465116 0.200843997647 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119186046512 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77183395611 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531976744186 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 56.919023033 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2 23.380412469 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6117328295 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 141.124799967 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 23.380412469 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 44.2348837209 51.4728631049 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.36893203883 1.64882698954 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219596049202 0.391690518653 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0891744843303 0.123202303941 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0654581528178 0.077325440228 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.455107354246 0.547984918172 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183517498217 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090746631047 0.161403998019 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104009664066 0.0892212321368 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.312490756029 0.385218514788 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0745387287561 0.0692045440612 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142795824229 0.275328986314 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083120980228 0.0653680567796 127% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88274336283 266% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 12.0 2.70907079646 443% => Less neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.