People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
People whose decision making skills are associated with emotions and post justification of the decisions taken based on logic are considered poor decision makers. However, this bifurcation of decision makers is not appropriate. The effectiveness of a decision should be measured by the results and not the cause of it.
Firstly, emotions are something which arise naturally in a person. Due to this fact, it is evident that the emotions would closely be related to one's thoughts. As a result, the decision taken would be more appropriate based on the given circumstances and mindset. To counter the argument that the decision taken solely on emotions could be impractical is the stated fact that it can later be justified by logic.
Helping poor children with money or food by looking at their remorseful situation or buying a gift to please someone is not a poor decision. Considering a hypothetical example: In case of a fire emergency in a building, if a person is stuck in the premises and somebody who knows the process of evacuation helps the person in need
by risking one's own life; can be considered an emotional as well as a thoughtful decision.
Hong Kong has recently witnessed a large number of rallies and protests to oppose against China's domination over Hong Kong from the year of 1940. The people of Hong Kong have an autonomous government based on different ruling policies as opposed to China. The protests are majorly driven by the patriotic emotions of denizens of Hong Kong towards their country.
On the other hand, there can be situations where emotion driven decisions prove to be deleterious. Considering the ruler of North Korea who is much known for his dictatorial approach towards his ruling. He makes certain decisions based on his fantasies which can ultimately have a worse impact on the whole world.
In sum, if a decision is taken emotionally and it can also be backed up later with logic then the person making the decision cannot be considered a poor decision maker unless it has any deleterious impacts to the humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he emotions would closely be related to ones thoughts. As a result, the decision tak...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of evacuation helps the person in need by risking ones own life; can be conside...
^^^
Line 8, column 34, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...on. Hong Kong has recently witnessed a large number of rallies and protests to oppose against ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, then, well, as a result, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9711815562 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79617327601 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533141210375 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8663148024 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8125 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291612155875 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102220918641 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953264038518 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144705038699 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110723644945 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.