Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement has argued scientists and researchers to focus on areas that for greater benefits to mankind. I disagree with the opinion.
researches play vital role in advance role in any field be it physics, Chemistry or Medicine. Had Newton not discovered law of motion of motion, the study of forces and dynamic had not reached to the point it is today. Had Boyle not discovered how volume, pressure, and temperature related for gases, the study of fluids would have been initial phases.
new discoveries lead to better understanding of various phenomena which could accelerate the wheel betterment. it has been through this new finding that we have modern gadget around us. if Plank had not discovered facts related photon, electrons and wave-particle duality, the modern light sensor and digital camera could not be reality today. Had Krickchoff not discover his laws regarding electricity, the transmission of power could not achieve.
Science and general research are always of great benefit to the society. With advert of smart phones it now easy to communicate with using video call and voice and text messaging. The airplanes reduce the travel time. studying past wars, social scientist have now concluded that it results in nothing but further violence and death and are now discouraging it at all forums.
Knowledge is never wasteful, it is just that we are not always able determine the benefits when first get to know about something new. At times, theories presented are not immediately utilized. However, the use it identified later. Who knew back then that Eisenstein’s work on modern physics would turn of immense important is years to come. Leonardo Da Vinci was a great mathematician and scientist, but he was years ahead of his time. Many of his ideas could not be understood back then and to materialize some was challenge as certain type of raw materials were not manufactured back then. if researcher leave a topic research if they cannot find any advantage of their findings, then it would prevent future work.
The motive of researches should be based on digging deeper into pool of knowledge. research has always lead to beneficial outcomes whether known to people immediately or discovered in years to come.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Researches
...kind. I disagree with the opinion. researches play vital role in advance role in any ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of motion'.
Suggestion: of motion
...Medicine. Had Newton not discovered law of motion of motion, the study of forces and dynamic had no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...ds would have been initial phases. new discoveries lead to better understandin...
^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... could accelerate the wheel betterment. it has been through this new finding that ...
^^
Line 10, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Studying
.... The airplanes reduce the travel time. studying past wars, social scientist have now co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 599, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...erials were not manufactured back then. if researcher leave a topic research if th...
^^
Line 16, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Research
... digging deeper into pool of knowledge. research has always lead to beneficial outcomes ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 104, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... pool of knowledge. research has always lead to beneficial outcomes whether known to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16847826087 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77306021373 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611413043478 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0350515231 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138229316921 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412162114297 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538174492737 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873182352961 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074825157657 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.