Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Think of an energetic, mentally sharp young employee starting his office & within a few days he got promoted by his performance whereas double aged senior employee has been in the same position for the last 10 years. The prior example is presented to elucidate a view what the statement is attempted to draw & obviously that is a very common scenario what is going on most of the organizations now a days. What i feel, certainly promotion based on work performance is an important standard but it should not be the paradigm as there are some other factors related to that. So, there should be a balance between performance, seniority and compensation.
Surely many of us in the Indian subcontinent hae gone through the state of disgust while doing something in a government office, where the sycophantic middle aged employee is doing his job in a sloth like speed. Though, may be there is no question regarding his probity, for the efficacy of the organization that is not desirable. On the other hand, a new energetic employee in that situation can make the difference by his speed, dedication because of better focus and courageous attitude of going against the conventional way. So, for this, he should be properly rewarded by increasing compensation otherwise malaise will come over and he will be demotivated. So, as motivation comes from reward, work performance should be evaluated by companies to increase productivity.
So, it is tempting to evaluate performance and determine compensation,however, every organization is structured based on some values & principles and that is why, there should be a proper reward for serving the company for a long time. For example, a senior employee may not give the best performance like a new one but experience comes at a cost. There may arise some quandary which can not be solved by speed & wit but experience. So, by only evaluating daily performance we can not determine the whole package of compensation as it will also demotivate the senior's and decrease productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...t is going on most of the organizations now a days. What i feel, certainly promotion based...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... going on most of the organizations now a days. What i feel, certainly promotion based...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t of the organizations now a days. What i feel, certainly promotion based on work...
^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f us in the Indian subcontinent hae gone through the state of disgust while doing...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... companies to increase productivity. So, it is tempting to evaluate performance...
^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...e performance and determine compensation,however, every organization is structured based...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'i feel', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215053763441 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.158602150538 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0860215053763 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0618279569892 0.0497285424764 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0349462365591 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118279569892 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0672043010753 0.0406280797675 165% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.105602142 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0134408602151 0.030933414821 43% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115591397849 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0376344086022 0.0249443105267 151% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0188172043011 0.0148568991511 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2028.0 2732.02544248 74% => OK
No of words: 339.0 452.878318584 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98230088496 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342182890855 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277286135693 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22418879056 0.200843997647 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153392330383 0.132149295362 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.105602142 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.48968727796 116% => OK
Word variations: 62.5722783558 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0769230769 23.380412469 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4068653162 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 141.124799967 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 23.380412469 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.674092028746 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 53.8055366462 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.56842105263 1.64882698954 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453539542602 0.391690518653 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118213925828 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0640106153394 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480190464517 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126540865781 0.149214159877 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183789232156 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617101893779 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42625214862 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0284100743941 0.0692045440612 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3511423738 0.275328986314 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430105482707 0.0653680567796 66% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.