Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The two views presented both deem reasonable since corporations are operated to both satisfy the people in the societies they operate and to make money. Making the views exclusive, makes the assertion somewhat unreasonable. I do not fully agree with it.
To begin with, corporations have the responsibility of promoting the wellbeing of the societies in which they operate because the very first thing that comes to mind is how to satisfy the people. It is in satisfying the people that success will be realized. Corporations are not established for being established sake but to serve the people. This is the more reason why corporations carry out surveys to make sure they have the right niche before they settle on establishing or even the kind of service they should render. For instance, a car insurance company will first of all carry out a survey to be sure the people within the location will actually need the service and will patronize.
Additionally, it is a fact that, a satisfied customer will keep coming for more services; sometimes regardless of how expensive it may be. For instance, expensive hotels that render satisfactory services are always filled up with people not because it is expensive, but because their services wow their customers. Also, restaurants that serve very sumptuous meals are successful even though the quantity of meals in most cases are not satiable. It is all because they have the wellbeing of the people in mind.
Aside that, recommendation from customers to other people is assured when the corporation takes it upon itself to deliver well with the wellbeing of the people in mind.
In another school of thought, making money is deemed the responsibility of every corporation. Even though that may be true, it is a fact that abiding by the law alone do not guarantee success in service delivery. The thought of only making often results in the neglect of the satisfaction of the people. For example, in a retail store, self-check-out machines were introduced and resulted in reduction of hours for cashiers. Most of the members of the store saw the implication of the machines and requested to speak to the manager about it. Since nothing was done about it, it resulted in a reduction of patronage.
However, it can be noted that, having the wellbeing of the people at heart often leads to making more money as the people keep coming and they keep recommending to others. Abiding by the law and having only the interest of money, also makes corporations greedy.
To conclude, both schools of thought should be considered inclusively and not exclusively. Having the interest of the people goes a long way to reward corporations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...goes a long way to reward corporations.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, may, so, well, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97327394209 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84197554806 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472160356347 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0844617984 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0869565217 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65217391304 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283937922406 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798263592256 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845393681441 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134881598731 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673435849585 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.