“Some people believe that the most effective means of advancing the development of a society is by focusing on the contributions resulting from the goals of each individual. Others believe that goals pertaining to the whole society provide a necessary unifying direction, without which individual contributions are meaningless.”
Every human being has his or her perspective and agendas in their life basis on the aspiration. Having a goal in life is always helpful for the growth of one's individual which bolsters the personality and confidence of one. Humans are always live in a community or society for myriad reasons and they can't survive without each other hence their collaborative development subsume the focus of the community, I agree that most effective means of advancing the development of society is by focusing on the contributions resulting from the goal of each individual.
Firstly, from erstwhile pundits and scholars are people who always carried some agenda or goal in their life sometimes for community growth or individual. for example, after world colonization, almost every county in Asia seeking for independence and they have their messiah who was director contribution of independence of the nation. leaders like Mahatma Gandhi always had a vision and haruspication for liberation. His aspiration and vision gainsay of rulers escalate the society to unite together against the dictator.
Secondly, the thought process of human for goodwill always inspire others to do so and beneficiary to build a wit society for their good future. Abraham Lincon leads and directs American society for their rights and liberation with just one vision for social goodwill. He never bent towards hedonism always keep showing light to the community.
However, the vision of community never lead without any driving force which will be required leader and need of the leader arises because of galvanizing problem. so individual contribution may sway the entire community towards the laborious and germane requirement not towards irrelevant ideas
In totality, the prediction of problem-solving and leading towards the solution comprises community participation with plum and pundit leader without some light it is impossible to change in society goodwill. Like one bad element can ruin the food, one good addition can also change it dramatically hence I believed that the most effective means of the development of society is by focusing on the contribution resulting from the goals of each individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ife is always helpful for the growth of ones individual which bolsters the personali...
^^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... or society for myriad reasons and they cant survive without each other hence their ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...mes for community growth or individual. for example, after world colonization, almo...
^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...ribution of independence of the nation. leaders like Mahatma Gandhi always had a vision...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... arises because of galvanizing problem. so individual contribution may sway the en...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35465116279 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90559851049 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.3558510108 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.692307692 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274815527561 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899722230617 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121209633467 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15536855337 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118879333852 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.