Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Nowadays, political people have several opinions to be an effective leader. Some visionaries argue that political heads must yield to public opinions whereas others claim that leaders should follow particular principals consistently. Admittedly, both opinions are equally important. As far as I see it, the latter opinion is more convincing than the former one. However, without considering advantages of the former one, it would be erroneous to agree with the latter one, and I, therefore, insist both ideas must be weighted appropriately.
To begin with, one logical explanation for my fundamental agreement for the latter statement is that, today, the ability to remain consistently committed to particular objectives is the way to pursue ideal. To illustrate what I mean, let’s consider nationality discrimination problems with Japan and Korea. Some Japanese hate people who have Korean mother or father, so if the government pursue Japanese people’s ideal, Korean people will never be able to marry with the Japanese people, but because politicians consistently pursue the particular goals of human rights, people in Japan have equal rights. Therefore, I believe that admitting principle for the sake of compromise is substantial.
Furthermore, the latter statement also pursue people’s ideal of safety world. By agreements of country’s safety law which promised that the country will not fight anymore, we didn’t have any world war since WWII. Governments follow world’s rule and it was the great way to be a leader. If they use some opinions which want to start the fight for resource or money, world war will not end, but most people don’t hope to fight with other countries, thus, we have to pursue particular principles to not take minority opinions, so I believe that to take people’s true ideal, which can keep safe country, is the way to make a principle goal.
Even with all reasons, however, it would be still too perfunctory to conclude that pursuing ideal is worthless. Honestly, some people need emergently change of the politics which we cannot make change in the current law. Suppose, for instance, you became a pregnant, but you are not afforded to born her. However, if the law doesn’t allow you to abort, you should have a debt and work really hard even your body would be illness. Hence, we sometimes need to consider about ideal needs for people. Pursuing ideal is the great way to change the law for some people.
Consequently, I advocated that the effective reader can follow principal, but sometimes considering ideal is necessary. The main reason is that principal can generate people’s true ideals to not occur discrimination and war, but sometimes thinking about individual needs are necessary to change the current law. Considering these reasons, I want to stress that effective leaders can follow both principal and ideals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...keep safe country, is the way to make a principle goal. Even with all reasons, however...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, honestly, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, i mean, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2460.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33622559653 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93245964962 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51409978308 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2397398598 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.818181818 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247575328292 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765162504662 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772129054929 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133932245269 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691170861054 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.