Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Many people would think modern science has given us a better understanding of the world around us. In some senses, it is true that scientists discover unknown aspects of our world. In my point, however, when it comes to how many facts to discover remains and the method of science work that a new theory refutes previous results, the more progressive the researches about nature is, the harder we can understand nature.
Of course, it is deniable that through scientific research, we can understand how our world organizes and work. In researching organisms, new scientific researches enlighten our view about living things. For example, the research about honeybees' dance, we can know their language, signals. Even now we can control their behavior using a robot which mimics their dance. This implies that scientific achievement widens our perception of the rule of nature.
Nonetheless, the science shows us how small we are comparing with extremely large the universe. After human has the civilization, we have tried to understand organisms, the rule of physics, all environment which surrounds us. However, as science and technology develop, we realize that there are many things that we have not known and have to try to know. For example, after taxonomy came to birth in biology, biologist have collected specimens and classify them. However developed technology told them there are many fallacies in their classification and unknown species until now. This shows that the key role of science does not give information about nature, but give us questions about how many things we even don't know their existence.
Moreover, the trait of science made our thought more complex than before. New theories refute old theories and if old theories are incorrect, the theories would be thought of as the only history of science. Or, if old theories are though as proper, controversial would occur. And this course will be repeated again when other new theories came out. This shows that science cannot give us a definite answer to our curiosity but gives us the complexity
To summarize, foolish people would deny that science is helpful for us to raise our knowledge about the world. However, about how science works and many questions to solve and many things to discover, we cannot always say that the subject gives us ample explanation about our world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... collected specimens and classify them. However developed technology told them there ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...questions about how many things we even dont know their existence. Moreover, the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
...al would occur. And this course will be repeated again when other new theories came out. This ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62212159075 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9555219751 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285828754055 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935038928613 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101850582493 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170785427102 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715691395957 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.