Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
There are two views in developing a society. The given statement suggests that some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. I believe both the views are interdependent on one another and cannot exist as a sole idea to be implemented but if it were to chose one then I would chose that teaching morality should be the foundation of education.
Education is a lifelong process however, it is something that starts with young, tractable children and leaves a lasting impression on them, molding their minds and shaping the way they see the world. If moral education and ethics are imparted to them so that they imbibe values in the very beginning of their lives then they would grow up to be responsible humans with a strong understanding of separating the ethical from the unscrupulous.
This is necessary when we see burgeoning rogues and terrorists who have a malevolent or diabolical bent of mind and do not mince in harassing humanity. If quixotic ideas and beliefs that build a sangfroid society and stem the growth of malpractices are introduced early in life then not only are we developing a generation that is logically wise but also not base when it comes to morals.
On the other hand proponents of teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would suggest that the child can lose his learning of morals along the way as he/she grows up and encounters more people with different proclivities and predilections, but logic would be retained throughout due to its regular use in the quotidian world. Undoubtedly, this is not an invalid point however we can say that logic is something that a child can learn at any point in life. The canons of logic are eternal and would never change. However, if the child were to learn about being moral and performing deeds that were beneficial to the society in a later part of his life then he/she would find it a task to absorb the ideas that may or may not seem conflicting to him/her.
Nevertheless, this is a topic of contention but I feel, a balanced approach is the middle way out. Without undermining or superseding either of the ideologies, if we present them collectively as per the commensurate need for children then not only do they learn about morals but at the same time they also recognize the logic behind it that which is imperative. In this way the equanimity between both schools of thought is retained and the shaping of naive mindsets is done in the most cohesive way as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
...ut if it were to chose one then I would chose that teaching morality should be the fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80357142857 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79901814053 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488839285714 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4887553194 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.466666667 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8666666667 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354681558357 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13221713537 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178267805836 0.0758088955206 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179310132928 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208375940663 0.0667264976115 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.