Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the hposition you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author claims that there are two different views on the preservation of nature. Some group of people believes that these areas should remain intact; on the other hand, another group underestimates these regions for economic benefits. In what follows, I will list the possible reasons for both attitude; then, I will assert my standpoint toward this issue.
The people who believe the wilderness should be protected in their natural stand could be believed in the butterfly effect. Indeed, for the sake of complicated and interconnected feature of the creatures in nature, the depilation of one factor will demolish others too. This fact is based on the butterfly effect. This effect is popular affirmed in 1961 by the predictive modeling of meteorologist Edward Lorenz. According to this fact, the wings movement of a butterfly in an area could lead to an adverse storm in another far region. Therefore, this group also assumes that by tilting the existing balance of nature, the globalized adversity will appear which affect all individuals.
As mentioned, there is another group who overweigh the importance of the financial flourishing over natural preservation. This group seems to possess this clue that the economical thrive and flourishment could deal with lots of human problems such as the joblessness, homelessness, and better products. For instance, the construction of a factory in a nation provides a list of the occupancy opportunity for the people in that society. The affair is equal to income and deposit for owning a better house. Furthermore, nature is a chasm and free source of raw materials; for example, the jungle tresses are a good source for the production of paper. In this scenario, from this group outlook, if nature provides these opportunities the governor should opt them to provide the facilities for his or her people.
I should say that it is the first perspective with which I largely concur. First of all, from my point of view, the reason for which the first group relies on to support their opinion is sensible and plausible. Furthermore, I have one more reason which makes me believe that nature should save intact and it is the economic benefits. In fact, the ecosystem chain is correlated with each other. The plants and their roots save the soil from the erosion, the flourished soil provides the required rearing and background for increments of the flora diversity. According to this variety, the different type of species appears in the ecosystem. This rich ecosystem is a great option for the attraction of tourists all around the world. This point gets highlighted as the financial profit of the tourist sector is considered. According to the noteworthy statistic released by the Turkish newspaper named Hurriyet, 45 percent of the turkey annual income is through the tourist sector. This is a striking number, which depicts the power and potential of this sector. Consequently, by providing a wide range ecosystem with fresh air and appealing sight views, there will be sufficient income for the nation.
To wrap it up, based on the all discussed arguments I believe that nature should retain its wilderness to prevent the possible ecological and environmental disaster and considered as the income potential for the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wings'' or 'wing's'?
Suggestion: wings'; wing's
...ard Lorenz. According to this fact, the wings movement of a butterfly in an area coul...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the income potential for the society.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2752.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14392523364 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81554523321 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508411214953 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0812275398 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.925925926 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8148148148 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.62962962963 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251433369987 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644885636397 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607295427959 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149970647313 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331652898663 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.