Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The 20th century technological revolution has changed the lives and surroundings in which human live. Then in the middle of the century the coming of computer followed by the internet has not only changed communication, knowledge structures but the entire philosophy of human existence.
One of the major boom of the technological revolution was the computer and the rise of world wide web. Information and data revolution, and the digitization of books and finance has led to major shifts in how humans structured their surroundings. The coming of the internet has been a medicine for the bureaucratic dizziness. Coming of internet banking, online booking system, e-tax filing systems has made bureaucratic works untiring. Much of the work can be done on the PC or mobile handset sitting at home or office. This has also brought up issues like surveillance and data privacy issues.
An educated mass has also become self sufficient, to a certain level, like they have learned to self medicate based on the information provided in medical websites(like MediWorld). There are research papers and old rare documents available in different fields which can be accessed specially from open sources journals and websites under digital commons. Thus knowledge has become easier to obtain; perviously to read journals and access rare documents it was necessary to access libraries. Progress it self is a double aged sword- as knowledge become readily available so is the flurry of spurious sites and journals. There are many youtube pages that provides unscientific information pertaining to health and medicine.
The same can be seen over the social media. While it has become a medium of communication to access to information in the globalised world, it has also become an effective medium for propaganda and fake news. We have come across the role played by the Facebook in US elections or in India how fake news is used in Watsapp groups to sabotage facts. While one one hand people are fighting for their right to privacy hence reduction of userdata available to the private companies. On the other hand its important to have the data for these priavte agencies to control fake news.
So while the Internet promised to simplify and make life easier in the fast changing globalised world but its has constantly making life difficult. Once what was considered a boon can well become bane. Though its social and political condition that ultimately decides the fate of technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...als and websites under digital commons. Thus knowledge has become easier to obtain; ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...necessary to access libraries. Progress it self is a double aged sword- as knowledge be...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: one
...Watsapp groups to sabotage facts. While one one hand people are fighting for their righ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s has constantly making life difficult. Once what was considered a boon can well bec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15346534653 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81824078625 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1510824402 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2380952381 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0652425951203 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0182600833774 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271385352098 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0399684317206 0.150359130593 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254322880218 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.