Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Anyone who wants to leave a lasting laegacy should have the confidence and faith on his ideas and should not take the doubts or criticism of others sersiously.
In this material world millions of people take birth and thousnds of people passes away every day. Mankind donot remember all of them-there are some who are forgotten with their death and at the same time there are a few whose names do not fades away. We all know about Bangabondhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman-the former president of People Republic of Bangladesh and the Father of the nation. Though he passed away, killed by rebel group, in 1975, people of Bangadesh still remeber him with great respect and will continue to do so. He was rigid to his very ideas that Bangladesh should be freed from Pakistani rule in order to give the mass people of Bangladesh an opportunity to enjoy freedom of politics and economics. In 1966 he demanded six points: all comprised of the basic idea of demanding the freedom for people. At that time doubts and criticism came with great number-the ruler of Pakistan rejected the ideas with contemt and he was arrested after that. Even people inside the country expressed their doubts that Pakistanis are not going to listen those demands but Mujib was rigid and placed his demands in front of the dictator Ayub Khan, President of Pakistan of that time. Later Mujib declaered war against Pakistan though his country, East Pakistan at that time, had no resources. The contemporary policians expressed their doubt about the declaration and told Mujib that his plan is not going to work. But Mujib was confident and keep faith in his dicisions. Becasue of his rigid dicisions the people of Bngladesh earned their independence after a nine months war against West Pakistan. The name of Mujib is written with golden pen in the history of Bangladesh.
We also about Right brothers whose idea of flying in the air was ridiculed by the people around them. However, the brothers didnot have the time to listen criticism and were strict to their plan and we all know what happen next. If the write brothers would have listened the doubts or criticism we would have to travel one country from another on foot not by aeroplane which they invented. Their name will be remembered by everyone while traveling by aeroplan.
There are sometime listening to doubts are important but most of the time the causes confusion.
In order to earn a legacy one must strict to his ideas and should not listen to the critics of his ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fade'?
Suggestion: fade
...time there are a few whose names do not fades away. We all know about Bangabondhu She...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...a of flying in the air was ridiculed by the people around them. However, the brothers didnot have the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...an and we all know what happen next. If the write brothers would have listened the doubts...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had listened'?
Suggestion: had listened
...what happen next. If the write brothers would have listened the doubts or criticism we would have t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'causes'' or 'cause's'?
Suggestion: causes'; cause's
... are important but most of the time the causes confusion. In order to earn a legacy ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79676674365 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39654548908 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512702078522 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3546693545 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.85 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174650899953 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520784899545 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589198435139 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116813777648 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728902308483 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.