Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Legends have since time in memorial depicted resillience and succeeded against all odds in their circumstances and are acclaimed for this very reason.
Firstly, individuals who follow through with their ideas depict extraordinary focus and determination which eventually lead to success. Nelson Mandela, the freedom fighter against South african apethied, is an exemplar of visionary leaders as he was discouraged from fighting against the apethied. Amid all the struggles and misgivings of his course, he reamined focused ob the goal. This sired the independence of South Africa in 1994. Consequently, should he have given into the discouragement, perhaps South africa would not be a Republic, nor would his legacy have lasted.
Secondly, seeing through ones ideas despite criticisms tell a tonne about one's character. Perserverance is a desired trait not present in many individuals today. Hence, one who to execute his ideas regardless, surely succeeds and leaves a lasting legacy in their feild. Amongst the discoveries of the world today, it took terpid inviduals who brought forth an unconventional idea and stuvk with it.
It is however worth noting that sometimes criticisms are not entirely deleterious. Critisms to some extend can provide grounds of self-evaluation which then leads to improvement. Case in scenario, some discoveries have come to being after being criticised. The pioneers tookn into hconsiderations the critics and bettered their work. In short, criticisms should be taken into account though without entirely losing focus of the goal.
In essence, success also involves being teachable as an individual. It is then, through critics that one could discover their misfortunes. In that regard, adamance could lead to grave downfall of an invidual. In this case, critics from experts in that field could go a long way in benefitting the criticised.
In conclusion, an individual should be visionary and at the same time take into account criticisms. Legends are astute enough to recognice a benefitial criticism or ones thats aimed to impugn their vision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s despite criticisms tell a tonne about ones character. Perserverance is a desired t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 101, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
... entirely deleterious. Critisms to some extend can provide grounds of self-evaluation ...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... way in benefitting the criticised. In conclusion, an individual should be vis...
^^
Line 10, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ecognice a benefitial criticism or ones thats aimed to impugn their vision.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48916408669 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98864737811 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606811145511 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9717197318 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.4285714286 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.380952381 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221321297483 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637785105111 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896688661434 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106988022532 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100684267726 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.