Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
he statement, the past is of miniscule importance to the current positions of leadership, is prone to causing debate o the basis of its validity. Primarily, benevolent leaders seek to ensure the success of the institution of which they lead. In so doing, they will not only rely on their insights in strategy formulation and execution, but also use the past to inform their decisions. In that respect, the statement is not entirely cogent, and for ereasons this essay seeks to explore.
The history of any institution is key and cannot be disregarded in its endeavors whatsoever. Leaders, given the powers bestowed upon them, have the ability to change the insititution for the better, or in some cases for worse. Change can only be realized if the past is put into perspective; one can only change a circumstance that they have evaluated and internalized. For example, the CEOs of profitable firms will always have to ensure they maintain their profitability. The can only do this if the consider their past performance.
Building on the above point, monitiring and evaluation, is soley founded on refering to the past, so as to determine the futures fate. In the world today, eminent firms have heavily invested on Monitoring and evaluation of their strategies, research so as to inform the germane resolutions. This, they have managed to flourish in their respective sectors.
In essence, the past serves an appraisal of the leader themselve and other stakeholder. In companies, aCEO can only be regarded as successful if they have outdone the past performances for the better. Therfore, records of the past are important as they serve a major role, rendering the statement invalid.
In addition, in many cases, leaders have had to refer to the past so as to gain insight on certain matters. For instance, if theres an unusual occurence, it is only prudent to inquire the past. This way, a solution, from the pastv may be taken into account considering its efficiency and effectiveness.
I
Leaders are key determinants of the success or failure of any institution. In this respect, having explored the essence of the past, only the prudent leaders will consider the past and appropriately corporate it in their leadership. However, the over relience of the past may impair preclude a leaders success
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he statement, the past is of miniscule imp...
^^
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... profitability. The can only do this if the consider their past performance. Building on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... soley founded on refering to the past, so as to determine the futures fate. In the worl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...valuation of their strategies, research so as to inform the germane resolutions. This, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 67, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., leaders have had to refer to the past so as to gain insight on certain matters. For in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ht on certain matters. For instance, if theres an unusual occurence, it is only pruden...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05235602094 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93735008937 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7263261497 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.9047619048 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103969163342 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350234013967 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334347093994 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606425359691 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424050987803 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.