Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Leadership is not everyone's cup of tea and it plays a prominent role in the success or failure of a team or purpose. The prompt conveys that understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. But if a leader has the understanding of the past then he or she can take better decisons than ever. I will explain this in the next two paragraps.
Firstly, Leaders can take better decisions with the understanding of the past. It gives clear overwiew of the situation and helps them to take control over the situation. As we can see that if we were aware of the past decisions and its consequences then it will be very helpful in making valid and efficient decisions. By this way, a leader can save significant amount of time and invest their time in for other productive tasks and can lead his is peers in the right direction.
Secondly, there are situations which are simliar to the past but the circumstances are entirely different and it is leaders responsibility to analyze the sitaution thoroughly and make appropriate decision. Even though the problem is similar to the past but the it highly impossible to hadle this situation with the same measures taken in the past. In these situations, leaders has to be dynamic and they should make unorthodox decisions for the betterment of his or her peers. Furthermore, there are leaders who are not in sync with the understandings of the past and they proved to be successful. Such as leaders from amazon, facebook, google and so on.
It can be inferred from the above passage,leaders make the better judgment if they understood from the past. Howerver, it is not applicable in all situations and leaders who took unorthodox approaches were also succesful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
... the problem is similar to the past but the it highly impossible to hadle this situati...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , leaders
...t can be inferred from the above passage,leaders make the better judgment if they unders...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92753024465 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523333333333 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7380949454 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157052103832 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062085242503 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078681568012 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991752709938 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717743847575 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.