True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Are the goals one set for oneself be used primarily to measure true success? How is true success considered? Several people have different opinion of true success. Though, some consider true success to be the accomplishment of a task, while some consider true success as an act of being resilient when fazed with encumbrance. However, true success should not be measured in terms of the goals one set for oneself but in the achievement of set goals.
There are several types of goals human accomplish: long term goals and short term goals. These goals require perseverance to accomplish them and until these goals are attained, one cannot aserverate that one has achieved a success. History is repleted with myriad examples of heroes who set goals for themselves and these heroes were only consider successful on achievement of their goals. Thomas Edison for example, set the goal of begetting a light bulb. Despite Thomas being faced with several challenges while concocting the devise which lead to him failing a thousand times, he was resilient and achieved his goal on the end. Thomas success was not measured when he set the goal of producing the light bulb but when he accomplished his goal of producing a light bulb.
Another historical example of true success measured after the accomplishment of a goal is the invention of the first fixed wing plane by the Wright Brothers. The Wright Brothers had the plan of modifying the grotesque planes that were made during their time and were successful after several trials and errors. Despite facing several limitations while producing this plane, these Brothers’ success were not measure by the goal of making a fixed wing plane. Rather, their success were measured by the concluded production of a working fixed wing plane.
Although, some might contend that some goals one set are true indiator of true success as these goals seem utopian. These people might cavil further that utilitarian goals one set for oneself can be used truly measure true success. For example, Mahatma Gandhi setting goal of extricating the people of Indians from clutches of the British colonial masters. Notwithstanding, this is true to some extent as this goal is pragmatic. But consider Gandhi failing in his attempt to obtain this liberty, rather than setting the people free, he will rather cause further infliction on the Indians from the colonial masters. Thus, until Mahatma’s goal was totally achieved, the planned goals were not consider true measure of his success.
In summary, the goals one set for oneself cannot be used as measure of true success but the achievement of these goals should be used as the true measure of success. Looking at several examples such as the deeds of the father of light bulb; Thomas Alva Edison, the brains behind fixed wing plane; Wright Brothers and the great idealist; Mahatma Gandhi, one could see that true measure of success is the achievement of set goals and not the weight of planned goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'measured'.
Suggestion: measured
...plane, these Brothers’ success were not measure by the goal of making a fixed wing plan...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 692, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...ly achieved, the planned goals were not consider true measure of his success. In summ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03024193548 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53005397066 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397177419355 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2139219977 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.47826087 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5652173913 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283259787646 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120583937041 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898673174783 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193606951575 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724331507744 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.