Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Some people believe that the best way to solve traffic jams and city pollution is to increase the petrol cost. As I think there would be another essential measures affecting on these problems such as developing public transportation, I partially agree with increasing the price of gasoline. My reasons on this are as follows.
First of all, I think that rising the cost of petrol is actually a salient solution for solving the growing traffic and air pollution as well. This can lead people to start spending less money to fuel their personal cars and encourages them to use public services more so ever. For instance, if the monthly spending money on gas for a person is triple as high as metro and buses tickets, I think people would gradually cease using their cars for everyday usage in order to save more money.
Admittedly, this matter would raise the need of public transportation. When governments decide to increase the price of petrol, they should consider that poor public services are not going to be able to answer the needs of society members. The municipality should come up with a plan to develop these services in every measures. Easy access all over the city is needed as well. For example, if I can not find a bus stop near my house that can get me to my work easily, how am I going to be convinced to stop using my own car?
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that I am agreed with rising petrol cost in order to decrease the traffic jams and pollution but I think it is only effective when other measures are considered too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ce again reaffirm my position that I am agree with rising petrol cost in order to dec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52917668301 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0579212702 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182024785056 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682329967787 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080546825923 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134055751437 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779601221687 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.