It is generally believe that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
It is a cliché that talent is an inherited or a gained skill. Some people believe that genius and virtuous people are born with special powers but others declare that all toddlers have potential to become a world-class sports legend or musician. This essay will discuss both views and reach a conclusion.
On the one hand, main features of human are mainly determined by inherited genes. People can not change their voices, height and even structure of body muscles which are imprinted by the genes coming from parents. Hence, it can be claimed that human skills has developed in the womb of their mothers. For example, the fastest runners of the world, like Husain Bolt, was born in a same village of Kenya alike many other olympic runners. Scientist proclaim that the DNA has a profound role to explain this situation. Thus, no body ignore the role of genetic predisposition and background of the genius or talented people.
On the other hand, environmental factors cannot be ignored to explain the mysterious of skillful people. In under different conditions, same genetic codes may bring about various response according the environmental stimulus. For instance, although twins have the same DNA structures, they could show and obtain different abilities depending on education or the family in which they grew up. Therefore, any skill can be polished by hard working or vanished if it is ignored.
To conclude, despite the fact that some skills descended by our grand parents, having a good conditions to nourish these skills is vital as well as genes. In my opinion, both ideas have some correct points that genetic and environmental stimulus have equal importance to become a talented sports person or musician.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... have potential to become a world-class sports legend or musician. This essay will dis...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rited genes. People can not change their voices, height and even structure of bo...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. People can not change their voices, height and even structure of body muscle...
^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'proclaims'.
Suggestion: proclaims
...e many other olympic runners. Scientist proclaim that the DNA has a profound role to exp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'proclaims'.
Suggestion: proclaims
...e many other olympic runners. Scientist proclaim that the DNA has a profound role to exp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...d role to explain this situation. Thus, no body ignore the role of genetic predispositi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...genetic predisposition and background of the genius or talented people. On th...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nmental stimulus. For instance, although twins have the same DNA structures, they...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orking or vanished if it is ignored. To conclude, despite the fact that some ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10211267606 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64069248385 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4629114285 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235766845645 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631553988346 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645770097997 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137949302727 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633251996326 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.