Write about the following topic:
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, humans are producing more waste than ever before. The current level of recycling is insufficient that it may lead to an unprecedented disaster. To mitigate this environmental issue, I endorse the idea that governments should make recycling a legal requirement.
It is evident that there is a growing awareness of recycling among the public. This is mostly because of the rising concerns of various environmental issues, from pollution to scarcity of natural resources, reported by the media or taught by educators. As such, people who are conscious of the environmental problems and implication of recycling household waste may participate wholeheartedly. However, it is no doubt that people may simply ignore such practices as they have other concerns that are more important to themselves. Therefore, purely cultivating the importance of recycling may not be enough to make a significant contribution to the environment.
While significant efforts have been poured into raising the awareness of recycling, most people still cannot be expected to willingly dedicate their time and energy to recycle. However, people may follow the rules to recycle when governments implement stringent regulations. The laws and regulation provide people with clear measures on how to recycle their waste and punishment if the rules are violated. The Waste Disposal and Cleaning Law in Japan, for instance, has ensured the majority of its citizens to fall in line with government’s policy and dispose of their waste in accordance with guidelines stated, such as categories of waste materials, garbage bag labels, and even dates and weeks. Rubbish that does not meet the requirements will not be collected. Ar worst, frequent violators will receive a fine of more than one million yen. With such clear guidelines and stiff punishment, most citizens will comply with the laws enforced.
In conclusion, with the points elaborated above, I believe that it is crucial for governments to implement laws and regulation requiring all citizens to recycle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46540880503 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08553869347 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2626374693 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185294540138 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598257032679 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485246596139 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110122103267 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265819660417 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.