Children’s friends are an important part of their lives. What kinds of influence may children’s friends have on them? What is the best way for parents to make sure that their children’s friends are a good influence on them?
Friends help in a child’s emotional development. They are pivotal to growing years for sharing problems, in good or bad times and to share moments in life. This essay will discuss further about the kinds of influence friends have on children and some techniques parents can use to ensure that the influence is positive.
Friendships is undeniably a large influencing part in the cycle of life for emotional and social well-being. It defines who we are at every stage from infancy to old age. For example, recent studies have shown that children who played frequently with active friends were less likely to be inactive physically. However, it is not always easy for kids to navigate in the world of friendship, they can make some bad choices and may start smoking or taking drugs due to peer pressure.
Parents want to always protect their children and raise them to be kind, decent productive human beings. Open discussions and watching for red flags in a child’s behaviour are great practices that parents should adopt from early years. For instance, paying close attention to the behaviour of a child (positive or negative) and noting for changes when the make new friends is critical. In addition, parents can also check on the friend’s act when they visit or interact with them for clues to ensure their children are with the right kind of friends.
In conclusion, children need to have their social circle for their welfare but managing and monitoring the social path of a child’s life is important. Parents can achieve this by constantly inspecting and controlling the social circle of their child. In addition, keeping the communication line open is the key to successful parenting through all stages of a child’s life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00344827586 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64498942993 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8611978356 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358275165062 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114497857149 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837940107996 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211406051973 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064278662053 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.