Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It goes without saying that, worldwide commodities are more accessible for people that before. In my opinion, this trend could have both negative and positive consequences in equal measure.
Since the shipping goods considerably become a common form of business, people have experienced more quality products in terms of having different choices. Consequently, people can enjoy products from various cultures today. For example, a range of different cultures can be reflected in food bought overseas, such as Chinese foods or Mexican foods. Also, this pervasive interaction leads local industries to present superior characteristic as long as their foreign competitors’ merchandise are high in demand. Finally, as far as communication is concerned, this multinational relationship not only does world tension diminish, but also helps to establish world peace.
However, the availability of international brands can also be of negative to a community, create redundancies or job losses or even affect tourism. It goes without saying that, importing unnecessary products would create a devastating issue for traditional objects of a nation which might be ousted one day. Iranian carpet, for instance, has exposed to stop production due to artificial and more affordable ones which have widely been distributed throughout the world. What’s more, if people are encouraged to employ foreign goods, thinking it is more glamorous, there will be less likely to provide employment for local people whether these are medicine, clothes, or food. Eventually, tourism industry, may also be affected as people travelling to far flung places to see something exotic, not the same icons they see all around them at home.
In conclusion, the increase in universal products among the people, will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on individuals and communities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64893617021 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08927939831 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68085106383 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4108703451 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219817796622 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715557427593 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478891063774 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120889328269 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053044336756 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.