Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree.
Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
When people want to qualify for new occupation, may they be asked some questions such as personal information, hobbies, and marital status. Although some people think this information is usual for a select new employee, someones believe this information might lead to prejudice for the employer.
To begin with, it seems employers need some personal information about their employee; nonetheless, that kind of information may be useless such as marital status. because they believe if employers have information about their staff, they can offer a suitable occupation for them; in addition, they can offer some related activities are related to their personality. For instance, they can offer Business mission according to employee personality.
In contrast, some people think employers should not access personality information, in that they might have some prejudice about the new candidate for a new job. As a case in point, it might an expert one want to candidate for new occupation who is really suitable, that candidate is suitable but employer rejects his apply as a result of candidate member has Arabic name or employer has not good experiences with Arab people. Last but not least is employer should not let personal information to third parties.
In conclusion, personal information has a negative and positive impact on job vacancy, although that information useful for some specific jobs, that information can harmful to select the candidate without prejudice. in my opinion, personal information is not enough useful for employers and government should settle legal issue about employee private policy and employer’s policy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... may be useless such as marital status. because they believe if employers have informat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...select the candidate without prejudice. in my opinion, personal information is not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, really, so, third, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47843137255 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90827611706 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1371809565 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.7 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 7.06120827912 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368591764264 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166444733314 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723356856308 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241832128443 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686912078051 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.