Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food that throws away?
Wasting food has been seen as a growing phenomenon across the world. consumer behavior and eating for socialization are primary causes of this growing trend. A more conscious effort and more priority to quality over quantity while buying can help solve the problem.
To begin with the causes, growing economy creates an artificial demand for commodities in middle-class and high-class families which has resulted in people wanting to buy more food than they actually need. Subsequently many food cans bought from the supermarkets remain in shelves of the kitchen well beyond their expiry date before they can be put in use. this clearly indicates people buy more out of free will then need-based compulsion.
Moreover, people have found spending money recklessly on eatables as a medium to show prosperity and social rank. It is no more surprising to see people seating around a round table and ordering dishes way more than they can consume. A recent study conducted in China has shown that people are less likely to squander money in such wasteful eating if family sits together on a meal in a restaurant while, same numbers of people dining for a business meeting are likely to order twice as much.
As a solution, people should be encouraged to buy food items and consumables with more conscious choice at restaurants and marts. When people are reminded about items of immediate need and use, they will refrain from picking up commodities such as chocolates and cookies, they would buy just for shelving. Also, homes would not spoil and throw away a great deal of discarded food commodities if they had given priority to quality of their purchase rather than the amount.
In summary, Consumerism and socialization are the main reasons behind people throwing away food undesirably. By making informed decisions before buying things and eating better food than more food could reduce the wastage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consumer
... a growing phenomenon across the world. consumer behavior and eating for socialization a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
... buy more food than they actually need. Subsequently many food cans bought from the supermar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...iry date before they can be put in use. this clearly indicates people buy more out o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, in summary, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1054313099 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59643198119 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610223642173 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9451229463 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281381623223 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101856987616 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643183614224 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164437425783 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583201537354 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.