In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals in restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant. Which one would you choose and why?
Food is a crucial part of all humans' life which should be considered more than a simple meal because it can influence most aspects of an individual's life. In this regard, some people prefer to cook at their home and others like to eat in different restaurants. In my own perspective, I do believe that cooking is more logical than eating out because of two main reasons which are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, cooking can easily guarantee our healthy life. In fact, most of the people view eating as a useless action that repeats several times a day and ruins their time. Therefore, they try to eat as quickly as possible. However, these groups of people are in danger because they are not aware of the importance of the food and its effect on their health. My brother's life is a good example of this idea. He is a successful manager and always has a lot of works to do, as a result, he does not spend time cooking and eating at home, he usually buys sandwiches from fast-food shops. Since three years ago he has been suffering a dangerous illness, which is mainly related to the accumulation of extra fat in his heart's vessels. Most of the doctors forbidden him from eating at restaurants and instead they offer him cooking at home because people themselves use fresh ingredients for their food. Form this experience I always try to cook for myself even I am not an expert in this field but I want to stay healthy.
Secondly, we can save money by cooking at home rather than spending at an expensive restaurant. In fact, most fast-food and restaurants are located in an expensive area with a lot of employees. Therefore, they must make perfect money in order to be able to continue their business. To do this end, they increase the price of their food and lower the quality of their ingredients so it is not profitable to frequently eat out unless we are a rich person. My life as a university student is a perfect example of this idea. I am studying Management at the University of New York, an expensive city in the United States. The first semester I was eating in a restaurant near our university but at the end of the semester, I was totally out money because of the high prices. It is unbelievable to me that I paid 20 dollars for each hamburger while it cost at last 5 dollars if it is cooked at home. So I changed my way of life and I always cook at home, my hamburgers are not only cheaper but also more delicious and healthier.
In sum, above form the aforementioned explanation, I do believe that cooking at home is better than eating out. This is because of the lower price of the food and also the higher quality of ingredients that we use. That's why all of us should be aware of our eating habits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
Food is a crucial part of all humans life which should be considered more th...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...use it can influence most aspects of an individuals life. In this regard, some people prefe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...her quality of ingredients that we use. Thats why all of us should be aware of our ea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46520874751 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60744359467 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477137176938 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3345787841 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5833333333 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9583333333 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381275620443 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102690278038 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101475611072 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237786562155 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539908313821 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.