Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, Hiring is a process which companies gather people who work for them, and that is an important for companies' productivity and effectivity. So, these companies would concentrate that highly, the most part of them consider whole life of candidates, but a few of them not think their workers other life without working environments.
First of all, there are many ways which about getting workers, some of them last long but others last less. It depend's on which company hire employees, what is the jobs' levels, etc. For example, if the company is a big there would be a well-educated and experienced people whose hiring last long. And, these great companies usually an international, they have a high reputation and a brand name. Almost a few parts of their projects not need well worker their choosing activities must be difficult, because their names impacted negatively by their bad members.
Also, all people of our world have another life separated from their jobs. And, there are many situations and issues which faced by employees. Then, members of companies' of factories' could be influenced these facilities. And, some parts of these workers not affect but the most parts of them impacted harshly. There are a few approaches for solving these problems which decrease their members performances down.The first method is solving their members problems because these members are indispensible, the second approach is thinking their candidates whole life when selecting them.
In conclusion, taking account of all above reasons, members of factories would be perfect if the company great and it has high level name, in contrast there are not well members in small companies. so, I definitely agree that statement that the big companies should prefer workers for their entire life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ecrease their members performances down.The first method is solving their members p...
^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...didates whole life when selecting them. In conclusion, taking account of all abo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...re not well members in small companies. so, I definitely agree that statement that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 290.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19655172414 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66265180327 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9898390114 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108616275746 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428542777708 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527496886392 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775938486815 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188559127513 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.