do you agree or disagree? the bosses have to pay their employees to get a university degree.
There are some moot points about whether companies should pay for their staff to get university certification or not. The question of whether the university degree can boost the company or not has aroused as the subject of controversy among firms owner. When it comes to my potion, I strongly subscribe to the point that companies should not pay for employees to get academic degrees. I have some reasons two of which will be expounded hereunder.
The first reason worth discussing here is that corporations should employ their staffs toward their university degree. Generally, companies have many requirements for hiring their employer and academic certifications are one of the most significant requirement, therefore, without a university degree, nobody can take a position. To be more specific, companies need employees with vast knowledge about what they do consequently, pays for a university degree is very ridiculous for corporations. My personal example competently corroborates this idea that I vividly remember two years ago I searched for a good job in job finding websites, after sending too many resumes about my background position one day a company called me and invited me to an interview. In interview day I found out that there are only two open position and five applicants, thus, three of which should be eliminated. After admission result, I understood that three persons who were eliminated from the position had not any university degree. My personal experience competently corroborates this idea that a university degree is one of the requirements for employment and companies does not pay for education.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that, instead of paying for staffs education, corporations should pay for health insurance of their employee. In order to increase in medical expense, it is very significant for firms to insure their personnel. Hence there is a vital issue such as health insurance which companies should pay for that.my personal example demonstrate this reality our company insures whole staffs toward health issue. Two months ago one of my colleagues got a bad illness which needs to expensive medicine. Without that insurance he could not afford their cost, therefore, this insurance support my colleague and afford whole payments. My own experience shed some light to the point that there is an important matter that companies should pay toward their staffs.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, it is not necessary for companies to pay for their staff's education and degree. This certification not only is compulsory for everyone but also should stay in the queue after vital issue such as health insurance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...to get university certification or not. The question of whether the university degree can boost the com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nt for firms to insure their personnel. Hence there is a vital issue such as health i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25287356322 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9220063799 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496551724138 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3299139886 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.263157895 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8947368421 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193278323365 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073710716419 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573222716496 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131188683189 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478863489504 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.