Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Friendship is one of the most important things which everybody can have during life. When you have trouble with difficulties in your life, only your true friends may help you. Not many people have this realistic and pure friendship and those who have these brilliant friends are absolutely the lucky ones. Friendship with real friends makes you feel you are not alone. This type of friendship cannot be achieved only by passing a long time and having a close connection only with a few people. I, as an individual, think that the statement proposed in the question is true. Keep your few friends over a long period of time is more important than making new friends easily. I hold my opinion by bringing some reasons and examples in what follows hereunder.
The first and foremost, as I said above when you have some problems or issues and do not know how you can solve them you can trust your true friends and share your difficulties with them and get help from them. Also, because of being your true and honest friend, they would never manipulate or abuse you. I have a personal example. I have some friends who are the best ones in my life. A problem happened during my semester project and I ask of my friend to handle the project when I was not present in university and she willingly accepted my request and handle mine properly. That was a worthy thing for me and I reciprocate her kindness by buying her a gift.
Secondly, when you make many new friends easily, you also may lose them easily because most of them are fair-weather friends and you cannot trust them. I have another personal example here. My friend easily left me alone because of her boyfriend when I absolutely needed her help. So from then, I perceived that I must keep those few friends who are very kind to me and help me and I also help them either.
To sum up, every person has some true and real friends who are the best ones and should maintain his/her friendship with them and avoid making friendships with those who just want to abuse him/her. Also when you get old, the only your old and gold friends are beside you and help you and also are the inspiration to continue living. So be appreciative of your true friendships until your death.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 609, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...true. Keep your few friends over a long period of time is more important than making new frien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...h those who just want to abuse him/her. Also when you get old, the only your old and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5447761194 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35964123014 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4273327673 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241719678885 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795834159717 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082339595094 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16096619725 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894382380909 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.