Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

knowledge is an essential part of our life. Nowadays, knowledges spread quickly by different ways that help our society progress faster. some people believe that having widespread knowledge in many academic subjects is better, while others hold the opposite view. In my opinion, specialinzing in one specific subject have positive factor for two noticeable reasons.

First, acquiring a detailed information about special subject can solve particular problem quickly than vast knowledge. Although in the past the hidden aspect of science revealed approximately, they were a lot of assumption, some of them were paradox. However, now every person graduate only in one subject that help sovle antithesis quickly. For exmaple, about two century ago, many scienctic, who had assorted knowledge in various subjects, asserted a lot of hypotesis about cosmos. Unfortunatly, plenty of them caused course of researchers to deviate not only decreasing effeciency but also wasting time. but, as over time, scientist, who attained knowledge only about cosmos, can settle these wrong hypothises. if in the past individuals had had speicial knowledge about cosmos, now researcher would have unraval diverse face of it.

Second, specializing in one subject can casuse science to progress broadly. when people have elaborate schooling in ditincive subject, they deal with different part of it and consequently get more expreince. Therefore, they can resolve interior issue in subject that help spread out widespread. For instance, when I was graduating mechanical engineering from university, I was hired in car company. Fortunately, I had a lot of software skills because my thesis and my course were about car design. one day, my manager decided to manufacture the best car in the world and requisted group of engineers to desing special engine. All memebers who graduated in mechanic subject could create excellent model engine for car. As you can see, having special knowledge in one subject can progress quickly.

In conclusion, gaining special academic subject is better than having knowledge in many subjects. Not only does it solve problem quickly, but also it cause progressing faster. if we want to help our society, we should get knowledge in one subject.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Knowledge
knowledge is an essential part of our life. Nowad...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... that help our society progress faster. some people believe that having widespread k...
^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun assumption seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of assumptions'.
Suggestion: a lot of assumptions
...ience revealed approximately, they were a lot of assumption, some of them were paradox. However, no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ithesis quickly. For exmaple, about two century ago, many scienctic, who had assorted k...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 609, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...asing effeciency but also wasting time. but, as over time, scientist, who attained ...
^^^
Line 7, column 716, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...mos, can settle these wrong hypothises. if in the past individuals had had speicia...
^^
Line 7, column 743, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
... hypothises. if in the past individuals had had speicial knowledge about cosmos, now re...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...can casuse science to progress broadly. when people have elaborate schooling in diti...
^^^^
Line 13, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...is and my course were about car design. one day, my manager decided to manufacture ...
^^^
Line 19, column 152, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...s it solve problem quickly, but also it cause progressing faster. if we want to help ...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
..., but also it cause progressing faster. if we want to help our society, we should ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47863247863 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82457619762 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.873331364 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4090909091 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9545454545 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264116456657 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840078803124 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869007005257 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185581557048 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059825162707 0.0645574589148 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.